BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25372087)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Black WC; Gareen IF; Soneji SS; Sicks JD; Keeler EB; Aberle DR; Naeim A; Church TR; Silvestri GA; Gorelick J; Gatsonis C;
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(19):1793-802. PubMed ID: 25372087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Kumar V; Cohen JT; van Klaveren D; Soeteman DI; Wong JB; Neumann PJ; Kent DM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 168(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 29297005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Black WC
    J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 25635704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
    Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
    Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
    Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
    J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
    Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Tierney WM
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(4):387-8. PubMed ID: 25607439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Pinsky PF
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(4):387. PubMed ID: 25607438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Black WC; Keeler EB; Soneji SS
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jan; 372(4):388. PubMed ID: 25607437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
    Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
    PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.
    Kowada A
    BMC Pulm Med; 2022 Jan; 22(1):19. PubMed ID: 34996423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lung cancer CT screening is cost-effective but implementation matters.
    Goulart B
    Evid Based Med; 2015 Apr; 20(2):78. PubMed ID: 25715973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    Lung Cancer; 2016 Nov; 101():98-103. PubMed ID: 27794416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.
    Raymakers AJN; Mayo J; Lam S; FitzGerald JM; Whitehurst DGT; Lynd LD
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 26873091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.
    Jaine R; Kvizhinadze G; Nair N; Blakely T
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():233-240. PubMed ID: 30268467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 18FDG-PET-CT in the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: an economic evaluation.
    van Loon J; Grutters JP; Wanders R; Boersma L; Dingemans AM; Bootsma G; Geraedts W; Pitz C; Simons J; Brans B; Snoep G; Hochstenbag M; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 19944595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in a European country with high prevalence of smoking-A modelling study.
    Tomonaga Y; Ten Haaf K; Frauenfelder T; Kohler M; Kouyos RD; Shilaih M; Lorez M; de Koning HJ; Schwenkglenks M; Puhan MA
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Jul; 121():61-69. PubMed ID: 29858029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.