BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25372670)

  • 1. Covering complete proteomes with X-ray structures: a current snapshot.
    Mizianty MJ; Fan X; Yan J; Chalmers E; Woloschuk C; Joachimiak A; Kurgan L
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Nov; 70(Pt 11):2781-93. PubMed ID: 25372670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taxonomic Landscape of the Dark Proteomes: Whole-Proteome Scale Interplay Between Structural Darkness, Intrinsic Disorder, and Crystallization Propensity.
    Hu G; Wang K; Song J; Uversky VN; Kurgan L
    Proteomics; 2018 Nov; 18(21-22):e1800243. PubMed ID: 30198635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general target selection method for crystallographic proteomics.
    Robin G; Cowieson NP; Guncar G; Forwood JK; Listwan P; Hume DA; Kobe B; Martin JL; Huber T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 426():27-35. PubMed ID: 18542855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. fDETECT webserver: fast predictor of propensity for protein production, purification, and crystallization.
    Meng F; Wang C; Kurgan L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 18(1):580. PubMed ID: 29295714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of structural genomics target selection strategies: Pfam5000, whole genome, and random approaches.
    Chandonia JM; Brenner SE
    Proteins; 2005 Jan; 58(1):166-79. PubMed ID: 15521074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coverage of protein sequence space by current structural genomics targets.
    O'Toole N; Raymond S; Cygler M
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2003; 4(2-3):47-55. PubMed ID: 14649288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coverage of whole proteome by structural genomics observed through protein homology modeling database.
    Yura K; Yamaguchi A; Go M
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2006 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 17146617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.
    Serrano P; Dutta SK; Proudfoot A; Mohanty B; Susac L; Martin B; Geralt M; Jaroszewski L; Godzik A; Elsliger M; Wilson IA; Wüthrich K
    FEBS J; 2016 Nov; 283(21):3870-3881. PubMed ID: 27154589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.
    Grabowski M; Niedzialkowska E; Zimmerman MD; Minor W
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 26935210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models.
    Worth CL; Kleinau G; Krause G
    PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e7011. PubMed ID: 19756152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein production in Escherichia coli for structural studies by X-ray crystallography.
    Goulding CW; Perry LJ
    J Struct Biol; 2003 Apr; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 12718925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A proteome view of structural, functional, and taxonomic characteristics of major protein domain clusters.
    Sun CT; Chiang AWT; Hwang MJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):14210. PubMed ID: 29079755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AlphaFun: Structural-Alignment-Based Proteome Annotation Reveals why the Functionally Unknown Proteins (uPE1) Are So Understudied.
    Pan H; Wu Z; Liu W; Zhang G
    J Proteome Res; 2024 May; 23(5):1593-1602. PubMed ID: 38626392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The challenge of protein structure determination--lessons from structural genomics.
    Slabinski L; Jaroszewski L; Rodrigues AP; Rychlewski L; Wilson IA; Lesley SA; Godzik A
    Protein Sci; 2007 Nov; 16(11):2472-82. PubMed ID: 17962404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure determination of GPCRs: cryo-EM compared with X-ray crystallography.
    García-Nafría J; Tate CG
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2021 Nov; 49(5):2345-2355. PubMed ID: 34581758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure-based functional discovery of proteins: structural proteomics.
    Jung JW; Lee W
    J Biochem Mol Biol; 2004 Jan; 37(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14761300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
    Yarnitzky T; Levit A; Niv MY
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of protein disorder.
    Dosztányi Z; Tompa P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 426():103-15. PubMed ID: 18542859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The origins of modern proteomes.
    Kurland CG; Canbäck B; Berg OG
    Biochimie; 2007 Dec; 89(12):1454-63. PubMed ID: 17949885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.