313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25372707)
1. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Major PW; Carey J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):400-8. PubMed ID: 20841457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3D CT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. A pilot study.
Khambay B; Nebel JC; Bowman J; Walker F; Hadley DM; Ayoub A
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 12593005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization analysis for plane orientation in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis of serial cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Secanell M; Major PW; Carey JP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 21569990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.
DeCesare A; Secanell M; Lagravère MO; Carey J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20130035. PubMed ID: 23640988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional cephalometric superimposition of the nasomaxillary complex.
Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Dietrich N; Lagravère-Vich MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):758-64. PubMed ID: 25432257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
