159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25373253)
1. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 1: renal setting.
Nicholls M
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S20-1. PubMed ID: 25373253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 2: paediatric intensive care.
Franklin N
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S21. PubMed ID: 25373254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 3: paediatric care.
Whitton J
Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S22. PubMed ID: 25373255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infection rates associated with total parenteral nutrition.
Madeo M; Lowry L
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Dec; 79(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 21958684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressings.
Loftus MJ; Florescu CJ; Stuart RL
Med J Aust; 2014 Apr; 200(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 24702084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of chlorhexidine gluconate in the prevention of line-related infection.
Delesie L; Blot SI; Vanacker T; Vandijck DM
Am J Infect Control; 2011 May; 39(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 21531277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study.
Schwebel C; Lucet JC; Vesin A; Arrault X; Calvino-Gunther S; Bouadma L; Timsit JF
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21926570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a 1-piece chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing on critically ill patients.
Pfaff B; Heithaus T; Emanuelsen M
Crit Care Nurse; 2012 Aug; 32(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 22855077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial.
Ruschulte H; Franke M; Gastmeier P; Zenz S; Mahr KH; Buchholz S; Hertenstein B; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S
Ann Hematol; 2009 Mar; 88(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18679683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing: an efficient weapon against catheter-related bloodstream infection?*.
Mahjoub Y; Dupont H
Crit Care Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1742-3. PubMed ID: 24933057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tegaderm™ CHG dressing significantly improves catheter-related infection rate in hemodialysis patients.
Righetti M; Palmieri N; Bracchi O; Prencipe M; Bruschetta E; Colombo F; Brenna I; Stefani F; Amar K; Scalia A; Conte F
J Vasc Access; 2016 Sep; 17(5):417-422. PubMed ID: 27516139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduce the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in all vascular access?
Lorente L
Crit Care Med; 2015 Feb; 43(2):e50-1. PubMed ID: 25599496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prevention of catheter-related septicemia].
Lemmen S; Scheithauer S
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2014 Apr; 139(14):693-5. PubMed ID: 24668428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Chlorhexidine gluconate–impregnated central access catheter dressings as a cause of erosive contact dermatitis: a report of 7 cases.
Weitz NA; Lauren CT; Weiser JA; LeBoeuf NR; Grossman ME; Biagas K; Garzon MC; Morel KD
JAMA Dermatol; 2013 Feb; 149(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 23560299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlling exit site infections: does it decrease the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia in children on chronic hemodialysis?
Onder AM; Chandar J; Coakley S; Francoeur D; Abitbol C; Zilleruelo G
Hemodial Int; 2009 Jan; 13(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19210272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlorhexidine gluconate transparent dressing does not decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Yu K; Lu M; Meng Y; Zhao Y; Li Z
Int J Nurs Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):e12776. PubMed ID: 31631496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated patch does not decrease the incidence of bacterial colonization of femoral nerve catheters: a randomized trial.
Schroeder KM; Jacobs RA; Guite C; Gassner K; Anderson B; Donnelly MJ
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Oct; 59(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 22855310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness of dressing in the prevention of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients.
Pedrolo E; Danski MTR; Wiens A; Boostel R
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2018 Oct; 12(10):871-877. PubMed ID: 32004156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antimicrobial Activity of a Novel Vascular Access Film Dressing Containing Chlorhexidine Gluconate.
Wibaux A; Thota P; Mastej J; Prince DL; Carty N; Johnson P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143035. PubMed ID: 26599087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ["Getting to zero infections" in hemodialysis].
Leonardi G; Finotto G; Talaia M; Nappo A; Dolla C; Di Vico MC; Diena D; Linsalata A; Guarena C; Barbaro S; Biancone L
G Ital Nefrol; 2015; 32(5):. PubMed ID: 26480255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
