166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25373436)
1. How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?
Bansal GJ; Kotugodella S
Br J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 87(1044):20140530. PubMed ID: 25373436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast density: comparison of chest CT with mammography.
Salvatore M; Margolies L; Kale M; Wisnivesky J; Kotkin S; Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF
Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 24126363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.
Sacchetto D; Morra L; Agliozzo S; Bernardi D; Björklund T; Brancato B; Bravetti P; Carbonaro LA; Correale L; Fantò C; Favettini E; Martincich L; Milanesio L; Mombelloni S; Monetti F; Morrone D; Pellegrini M; Pesce B; Petrillo A; Saguatti G; Stevanin C; Trimboli RM; Tuttobene P; Valentini M; Marra V; Frigerio A; Bert A; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 25929945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis for breast density estimation in low dose chest CT scans.
Moon WK; Lo CM; Goo JM; Bae MS; Chang JM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Ivanova V; Chang RF
J Med Syst; 2014 Mar; 38(3):21. PubMed ID: 24643751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.
Sovio U; Li J; Aitken Z; Humphreys K; Czene K; Moss S; Hall P; McCormack V; dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1908-16. PubMed ID: 24556624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.
Li J; Szekely L; Eriksson L; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):R114. PubMed ID: 22846386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical evaluation of a fully automated mammographic breast density algorithm.
Abdolell M; Tsuruda K; Schaller G; Caines J
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():651091. PubMed ID: 23737861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.
Wang J; Azziz A; Fan B; Malkov S; Klifa C; Newitt D; Yitta S; Hylton N; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81653. PubMed ID: 24324712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
