These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25374255)

  • 21. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving.
    Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Car Gestures - Advisory warning using additional steering wheel angles.
    Maag C; Schneider N; Lübbeke T; Weisswange TH; Goerick C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():143-53. PubMed ID: 26264518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations - Different strategies, different reactions.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():410-426. PubMed ID: 29703596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Between-Tactor Display Using Dynamic Tactile Stimuli for Directional Cueing in Vibrating Environments.
    Eguchi R; Vacek D; Godzinski C; Okamura AM
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2024; 17(3):503-508. PubMed ID: 37578911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Head orientation biases tactile localization.
    Ho C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1144():136-41. PubMed ID: 17320836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hazard warning modalities and timing thresholds for older drivers with impaired vision.
    Xu J; R Bowers A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107599. PubMed ID: 38669900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
    Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vibration warning design for reaction time reduction under the environment of intelligent connected vehicles.
    Zheng J; Zhang T; Ma L; Wu Y; Zhang W
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103490. PubMed ID: 34139373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the attention network test using vibrotactile stimulations.
    Salzer Y; Oron-Gilad T; Henik A
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 24878598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driving errors that predict simulated rear-end collisions in drivers with multiple sclerosis.
    Krasniuk S; Classen S; Morrow SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 33688770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of mapping characteristic on audiovisual warning: Evidence from a simulated driving study.
    Wang Y; Wu B; Ma S; Wang D; Gan T; Liu H; Yang Z
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Feb; 99():103638. PubMed ID: 34768226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.
    Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.