These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25374471)

  • 21. The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets.
    Corcoran N; Ahmad F
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Feb; 99(2):284-6. PubMed ID: 26492864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-education families.
    Ryan L; Logsdon MC; McGill S; Stikes R; Senior B; Helinger B; Small B; Davis DW
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Jul; 46(4):218-28. PubMed ID: 24597957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the Informational Content, Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Health Information on Monogenic Diabetes.
    Guan Y; Maloney KA; Roter DL; Pollin TI
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Jun; 27(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28951986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Examining the online approaches used by hospitals in Sydney, Australia to inform patients about healthcare associated infections and infection prevention strategies.
    Park J; Seale H
    BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Dec; 17(1):788. PubMed ID: 29268700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.
    Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Mar; 14(3):181-234. PubMed ID: 27532144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving Health Literacy Responsiveness: A Randomized Study on the Uptake of Brochures on Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Health Care Waiting Rooms.
    Jansen CJM; Koops van 't Jagt R; Reijneveld SA; van Leeuwen E; de Winter AF; Hoeks JCJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 34068577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Readability and suitability assessment of educational materials in promoting the quality of life for postmenopausal women.
    Morowatisharifabad MA; Yoshany N; Sharma M; Bahri N; Jambarsang S
    Prz Menopauzalny; 2020 Jul; 19(2):80-89. PubMed ID: 32802018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of Informational Brochures on Knowledge of Cataracts in Rural Ecuador.
    Oncel D; Bal S; Mazon NKC; Smith Z; Marjane S; Gable E
    Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e35555. PubMed ID: 37007411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Limited literacy revisited implications for patient education.
    Foltz AT; Sullivan JM
    Cancer Pract; 1999; 7(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 10352077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures.
    Freda MC
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 15867830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations.
    Hill-Briggs F; Smith AS
    Diabetes Care; 2008 Apr; 31(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 18202245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the suitability of written stroke materials: an evaluation of the interrater reliability of the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) checklist.
    Hoffmann T; Ladner Y
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2012; 19(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 22982829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.
    Boles CD; Liu Y; November-Rider D
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26896514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MDA and AAEM informational brochures: can patients read them?
    Galloway G; Murphy P; Chesson AL; Martinez K
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2003 Jun; 35(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 12830665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Text and graphics: manipulating nutrition brochures to maximize recall.
    Clark KL; AbuSabha R; von Eye A; Achterberg C
    Health Educ Res; 1999 Aug; 14(4):555-64. PubMed ID: 10557525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analysis of the readability characteristics of oral health information literature available to the public in Tasmania, Australia.
    Barnett T; Hoang H; Furlan A
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Mar; 16():35. PubMed ID: 26984514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of newborn hearing screening brochures and parental understanding of screening result terminology.
    Picou EM; McAlexander SN; Day BC; Jirik KJ; Morrison AK; Tharpe AM
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jun; 62(6):541-551. PubMed ID: 35522833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of written patient information for endoscopic procedures.
    Aabakken L; Baasland I; Lygren I; Osnes M
    Endoscopy; 1997 Jan; 29(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9083732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability, suitability, and characteristics of asthma action plans: examination of factors that may impair understanding.
    Yin HS; Gupta RS; Tomopoulos S; Wolf MS; Mendelsohn AL; Antler L; Sanchez DC; Lau CH; Dreyer BP
    Pediatrics; 2013 Jan; 131(1):e116-26. PubMed ID: 23209106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.