These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25375827)

  • 1. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Smith A; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15062866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of opposing lateral visuospatial asymmetries in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Loughnane GM; Shanley JP; Lalor EC; O'Connell RG
    Cortex; 2015 Feb; 63():220-31. PubMed ID: 25282061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual biases in the horizontal and vertical dimensions are driven by separate cognitive mechanisms.
    Churches O; Loetscher T; Thomas NA; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):444-460. PubMed ID: 26880348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of body and environment-centred coordinates on free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Smith A; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Cortex; 2006 Apr; 42(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 16771039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual rightward spatial bias varies as a function of age.
    Takio F; Koivisto M; Tuominen T; Laukka SJ; Hämäläinen H
    Laterality; 2013; 18(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 23231544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between vertical stimulation and horizontal attentional asymmetries.
    Nicholls ME; Thomas NA; Loetscher T; Wignall S; Yates MJ; Forte JD; Spence CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2384-96. PubMed ID: 22650990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native reading direction influences lateral biases in the perception of shape from shading.
    Smith AK; Szelest I; Friedrich TE; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2015; 20(4):418-33. PubMed ID: 25537526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of covert orienting of visual spatial attention along vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Mao L; Zhou B; Zhou W; Han S
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 17239829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.