249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25377451)
1. Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.
Svensson EI; Runemark A; Verzijden MN; Wellenreuther M
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25377451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences.
Svensson EI; Eroukhmanoff F; Karlsson K; Runemark A; Brodin A
Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3101-13. PubMed ID: 20629727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects on population divergence of within-generational learning about prospective mates.
Servedio MR; Dukas R
Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2363-75. PubMed ID: 23888857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of experience on the development of sexual behaviour of males and females of the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens).
Verzijden MN; Scobell SK; Svensson EI
Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():180-9. PubMed ID: 25193353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
Servedio MR; Bürger R
Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning to speciate: The biased learning of mate preferences promotes adaptive radiation.
Gilman RT; Kozak GM
Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):3004-12. PubMed ID: 26459795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Female mate preferences on high-dimensional shape variation for male species recognition traits.
Siepielski AM; McPeek SJ; McPeek MA
J Evol Biol; 2018 Aug; 31(8):1239-1250. PubMed ID: 29876989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The causes and evolutionary consequences of variation in female mate choice in insects: the effects of individual state, genotypes and environments.
Kelly CD
Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2018 Jun; 27():1-8. PubMed ID: 30025624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Males and females contribute differently to the evolution of habitat segregation driven by hybridization.
Kyogoku D; Yamaguchi R
J Evol Biol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):515-528. PubMed ID: 36721300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imprinting sets the stage for speciation.
Yang Y; Servedio MR; Richards-Zawacki CL
Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7776):99-102. PubMed ID: 31578486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mutation-order divergence by sexual selection: diversification of sexual signals in similar environments as a first step in speciation.
Mendelson TC; Martin MD; Flaxman SM
Ecol Lett; 2014 Sep; 17(9):1053-66. PubMed ID: 24943881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.
Rodríguez RL; Boughman JW; Gray DA; Hebets EA; Höbel G; Symes LB
Ecol Lett; 2013 Aug; 16(8):964-74. PubMed ID: 23809185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
