88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25379663)
1. Follow-up study of dental implants with bioactive oxide films on bone tissue healing and osseointegration: clinical radiography and bone quality analysis.
Chiang HJ; Cheng HY; Ou KL; Sinrang AW; Huang MS; Lin LH
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 25379663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of varying healing times on orthodontic mini-implant stability: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
Zhang Q; Zhao L; Wu Y; Wang H; Zhao Z; Xu Z; Wei X; Tang T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 21310631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancement of biomechanical behavior on osseointegration of implant with SLAffinity.
Chu KT; Cheng HY; Pan YN; Chen SY; Ou KL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Apr; 101(4):1195-200. PubMed ID: 23349074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crestal remodelling and osseointegration at surface-modified commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants in a canine model.
Lee J; Hurson S; Tadros H; Schüpbach P; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 39(8):781-8. PubMed ID: 22671935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High bone-implant contact achieved by photofunctionalization to reduce periimplant stress: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ohyama T; Uchida T; Shibuya N; Nakabayashi S; Ishigami T; Ogawa T
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 23314350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.
Bischof M; Nedir R; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 15355394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces.
Grassi S; Piattelli A; de Figueiredo LC; Feres M; de Melo L; Iezzi G; Alba RC; Shibli JA
J Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 77(10):1736-43. PubMed ID: 17032118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
