These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25380118)

  • 1. Objective information-theoretic algorithm for detecting brainstem-evoked responses to complex stimuli.
    Bidelman GM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Sep; 25(8):715-26. PubMed ID: 25380118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked potentials based on mutual information.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 26924597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
    Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonification of scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) offers improved response detection over conventional statistical metrics.
    Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Jan; 293():59-66. PubMed ID: 28917659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
    Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Comparison of the Quality and Reliability of Auditory Brainstem Response Features Elicited by Click and Speech Sounds.
    Novis K; Bell S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 30142101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putative measure of peripheral and brainstem frequency-following in humans.
    Galbraith GC; Threadgill MR; Hemsley J; Salour K; Songdej N; Ton J; Cheung L
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Oct; 292(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 10998564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities.
    Kouni SN; Giannopoulos S; Ziavra N; Koutsojannis C
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2013; 34(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 23953938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques.
    Carter L; Golding M; Dillon H; Seymour J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 May; 21(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 20569668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The frequency-following response (FFR) to speech stimuli: A normative dataset in healthy newborns.
    Ribas-Prats T; Almeida L; Costa-Faidella J; Plana M; Corral MJ; Gómez-Roig MD; Escera C
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():28-39. PubMed ID: 30448690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.
    Krizman JL; Skoe E; Kraus N
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 20215743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scalp-recorded frequency-following responses in neonates.
    Gardi J; Salamy A; Mendelson T
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):494-506. PubMed ID: 526194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.