These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25380403)

  • 1. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
    Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limits on the generalizability of context-driven control.
    Hutcheon TG; Spieler DH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1292-1304. PubMed ID: 27109465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP Evidence for Implicit Priming of Top-Down Control of Attention.
    Blais C; Hubbard E; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):763-72. PubMed ID: 26765945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.
    Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: evidence for dimension-specific modulation.
    Lee J; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):617-27. PubMed ID: 24184348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The flexibility of context-specific control: evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings.
    Crump MJ; Milliken B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1523-32. PubMed ID: 19370487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation.
    Berger A; Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():64-72. PubMed ID: 31103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors.
    Verghese A; Mattingley JB; Palmer PE; Dux PE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 29043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects.
    Schmidt JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1496-505. PubMed ID: 27585071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Bugg JM; Jacoby LL; Chanani S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):844-59. PubMed ID: 20718569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect.
    Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 22670796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.