These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25381011)
1. Advising patients on visual fitness to drive: implications of revised DVLA regulations. Latham K; Katsou MF; Rae S Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 99(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 25381011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting the UK driving vision standards with reduced contrast sensitivity. Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF Eye (Lond); 2016 Jan; 30(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 26471119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of Snellen charts for testing visual acuity for driving: prospective study and postal questionnaire. Currie Z; Bhan A; Pepper I BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7267):990-2. PubMed ID: 11039964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with snellen and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts. Falkenstein IA; Cochran DE; Azen SP; Dustin L; Tammewar AM; Kozak I; Freeman WR Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 17706288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual acuity and legal visual requirement to drive a passenger vehicle. Kiel AW; Butler T; Alwitry A Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 12855962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application. Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards. Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and Agreement of Visual Acuity Using the ETDRS Number Chart, Landolt C Chart, or ETDRS Alphabet Chart in Eyes With or Without Sight-Threatening Diseases. Chaikitmongkol V; Nanegrungsunk O; Patikulsila D; Ruamviboonsuk P; Bressler NM JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 136(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 29346499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vision screening using the Acuidrive device. Atchison DA; Lal B; Schmid KL; Romeo B; Carkeet A Clin Exp Optom; 2024 Aug; 107(6):635-640. PubMed ID: 38350442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice. Rosser DA; Laidlaw DA; Murdoch IE Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Poor recognition of the UK minimum driving vision standard by motorists attending optometric practice. Pointer JS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 17470236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis). Kaiser PK Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2009 Dec; 107():311-24. PubMed ID: 20126505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual function and fitness to drive. Kotecha A; Spratt A; Viswanathan A Br Med Bull; 2008; 87():163-74. PubMed ID: 18718902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing. Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children. Laidlaw DA; Abbott A; Rosser DA Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 87(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 14507755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of varying the number of characters per row on the accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart. Shamir RR; Friedman YG; Joskowicz L; Mimouni M; Blumenthal EZ Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):971-6. PubMed ID: 26743750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An innovative visual acuity chart for urgent and primary care settings: validation of the Runge near vision card. Cooke MD; Winter PA; McKenney KC; Packard KL; Williams V; Dorsey EA; Szabo A; Visotcky A; Warren CC; Wirostko WJ; Weinberg DV; Kim JE; Han DP Eye (Lond); 2019 Jul; 33(7):1104-1110. PubMed ID: 30792525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vision and drivers--a South Wales survey. Anuradha S; Potter C; Fernquest G J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Sep; 29(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 17567678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart]. Veselý P; Synek S Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]