These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25381080)

  • 1. Intrauterine devices at six months: does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network.
    Ravi A; Prine L; Waltermaurer E; Miller N; Rubin SE
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2014; 27(6):822-30. PubMed ID: 25381080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study.
    Bayer LL; Jensen JT; Li H; Nichols MD; Bednarek PH
    Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 22560185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complications of use of intrauterine devices among HIV-1-infected women.
    Sinei SK; Morrison CS; Sekadde-Kigondu C; Allen M; Kokonya D
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9111):1238-41. PubMed ID: 9643743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices.
    Aoun J; Dines VA; Stovall DW; Mete M; Nelson CB; Gomez-Lobo V
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):585-592. PubMed ID: 24499755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective review of intrauterine device in adolescent and young women.
    Alton TM; Brock GN; Yang D; Wilking DA; Hertweck SP; Loveless MB
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 25(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 22578480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary care physicians' concerns may affect adolescents' access to intrauterine contraception.
    Rubin SE; Campos G; Markens S
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2013 Jul; 4(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 23799710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications.
    Teal SB; Romer SE; Goldthwaite LM; Peters MG; Kaplan DW; Sheeder J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):515.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26116873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
    Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical versus laboratory screening for sexually transmitted infections prior to insertion of intrauterine contraception among women living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kakaire O; Byamugisha JK; Tumwesigye NM; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1573-9. PubMed ID: 25979373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IUD services among primary care practices in New York City.
    Jacobson L; Garbers S; Helmy H; Roobol H; Kohn JE; Kavanaugh ML
    Contraception; 2016 Mar; 93(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 26569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications associated with IUD use in a family practice setting.
    Lewis RD; Shank C
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jan; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 759549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications among adolescents using copper intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Rasheed SM; Abdelmonem AM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 115(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 21872240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
    Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations.
    Luchowski AT; Anderson BL; Power ML; Raglan GB; Espey E; Schulkin J
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 24679477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective evaluation of the intrauterine device in a patient population in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Jagroep SR; Pichardo MS; Arribas L; Heredia G; Coccio E; Palermo TM
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2016 Apr; 42(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 26420847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation.
    Teal SB; Sheeder J
    Contraception; 2012 Mar; 85(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 22067773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Copper-7 intrauterine device (Gravigard). Report of experience].
    Jürgensen O; Stenzel I; Wirth A; Sina D; Taubert HD
    Fortschr Med; 1976 Mar; 94(9):515-21. PubMed ID: 964914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrauterine device developments.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.