These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25381111)

  • 21. [Nitrogen removal by enhanced endogenous denitrification with excess activated sludge reduction technology].
    Wang JL; Peng YZ; Gao YQ; Wang SY; Gao CD
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Jan; 29(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 18441930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanism for sludge acidification in aerobic treatment of coking wastewater.
    Chao YM; Tseng IC; Chang JS
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Oct; 137(3):1781-7. PubMed ID: 16784811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of effluent removal prediction model efficiency in septic sludge treatment plant through clonal selection algorithm.
    Ting SC; Ismail AR; Malek MA
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():260-5. PubMed ID: 23968912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry.
    Foladori P; Bruni L; Tamburini S; Ziglio G
    Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3807-18. PubMed ID: 20537673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of filamentous bulking problems: developing an image analysis system for sludge composition monitoring.
    Jenné R; Banadda EN; Smets I; Deurinck J; Van Impe J
    Microsc Microanal; 2007 Feb; 13(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 17234035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generalized classification modeling of activated sludge process based on microscopic image analysis.
    Khan MB; Nisar H; Ng CA; Lo PK; Yap VV
    Environ Technol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 28278778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using image processing for determination of settled sludge volume.
    Mullins D; Coburn D; Hannon L; Jones E; Clifford E; Glavin M
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Aug; 78(1-2):390-401. PubMed ID: 30101774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Design procedure for carbon removal in contact stabilization activated sludge process.
    Sarioğlu M; Orhon D; Görgün E; Artan N
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):285-92. PubMed ID: 14753548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early warning-system for operation-failures in biological stages of WWTPs by on-line image analysis.
    Heine W; Sekoulov I; Burkhardt H; Bergen L; Behrendt J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):117-24. PubMed ID: 12360998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduction by sonication of excess sludge production in a conventional activated sludge system: continuous flow and lab-scale reactor.
    Vaxelaire S; Gonze E; Merlin G; Gonthier Y
    Environ Technol; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1307-20. PubMed ID: 19149352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total concentrations and fractions of Cd, Cr, Pb, Cu, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants.
    Wang C; Hu X; Chen ML; Wu YH
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Mar; 119(1-3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15752872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rheological characterisation of municipal sludge: a review.
    Eshtiaghi N; Markis F; Yap SD; Baudez JC; Slatter P
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5493-510. PubMed ID: 23899879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Upgrading activated sludge systems and reduction in excess sludge.
    Hazrati H; Shayegan J
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Nov; 102(22):10327-33. PubMed ID: 21940165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wastewater treatment in a hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor.
    Tizghadam M; Dagot C; Baudu M
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):550-7. PubMed ID: 18078710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monitoring and troubleshooting of non-filamentous settling and dewatering problems in an industrial activated sludge treatment plant.
    Kjellerup BV; Keiding K; Nielsen PH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):155-62. PubMed ID: 11547978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of the usefulness of biological parameters for the control of activated sludge wastewater treatment plants in an interlaboratory study context.
    Arregui L; Liébana R; Rodríguez E; Murciano A; Conejero F; Pérez-Uz B; Serrano S
    J Environ Monit; 2012 May; 14(5):1444-52. PubMed ID: 22481149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of a UASB-digester system treating domestic wastewater.
    Alvarez JA; Armstrong E; Presas J; Gómez M; Soto M
    Environ Technol; 2004 Oct; 25(10):1189-99. PubMed ID: 15551833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the impact of single-walled carbon nanotubes in an activated sludge wastewater reactor.
    Yin Y; Zhang X
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):623-8. PubMed ID: 18725731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tracking the inorganic suspended solids through biological treatment units of wastewater treatment plants.
    Ekama GA; Wentzel MC; Sötemann SW
    Water Res; 2006 Nov; 40(19):3587-95. PubMed ID: 16949122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.