These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382019)
1. Robotic versus non-robotic instruments in spatially constrained operating workspaces: a pre-clinical randomized crossover study. Cundy TP; Marcus HJ; Hughes-Hallett A; MacKinnon T; Najmaldin AS; Yang GZ; Darzi A BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25382019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Stefanidis D; Wang F; Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 19536599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial. Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance. Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Dakin GF; Gagner M Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-assisted Suturing Performance Among Novice Surgeons: A Blinded, Cross-Over Study. Møller SG; Dohrn N; Brisling SK; Larsen JCR; Klein M Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Apr; 30(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 32039938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience. Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assistance by adaptative damping on a complex bimanual task in laparoscopic surgery. Nassar A; Vérité F; Pechereau F; Vitrani MA Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 May; 19(5):929-938. PubMed ID: 38453723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 8 and 5 mm robotic instruments in small cavities : 5 or 8 mm robotic instruments for small cavities? Ballouhey Q; Clermidi P; Cros J; Grosos C; Rosa-Arsène C; Bahans C; Caire F; Longis B; Compagnon R; Fourcade L Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 28840328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SmartArm: Integration and validation of a versatile surgical robotic system for constrained workspaces. Marinho MM; Harada K; Morita A; Mitsuishi M Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2053. PubMed ID: 31677353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks. Leijte E; Claassen L; Arts E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32314094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion. Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Single-Port Laparoscopy More Precise and Faster with the Robot? Fransen SA; van den Bos J; Stassen LP; Bouvy ND J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):898-904. PubMed ID: 27705082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]