These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382071)

  • 1. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning.
    Lechner AM; Raymond CM; Adams VM; Polyakov M; Gordon A; Rhodes JR; Mills M; Stein A; Ives CD; Lefroy EC
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1497-511. PubMed ID: 25382071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
    Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Putting people on the map through an approach that integrates social data in conservation planning.
    Stephanson SL; Mascia MB
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1236-48. PubMed ID: 25102957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical actions for applied systematic conservation planning.
    Botts EA; Pence G; Holness S; Sink K; Skowno A; Driver A; Harris LR; Desmet P; Escott B; Lötter M; Nel J; Smith T; Daniels F; Sinclair S; Stewart W; Manuel J
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1235-1246. PubMed ID: 30912598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
    Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current practice and future prospects for social data in coastal and ocean planning.
    Le Cornu E; Kittinger JN; Koehn JZ; Finkbeiner EM; Crowder LB
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):902-11. PubMed ID: 24779578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.
    Guerrero AM; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 27601156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting.
    Williamson MA; Dickson BG; Hooten MB; Graves RA; Lubell MN; Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 33319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization.
    Nielsen ASE; Strange N; Bruun HH; Jacobsen JB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 27995662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating social preference in GIS-aided planning for forestry and conservation activities: a case study from rural SE Asia.
    Webb EL; Thiha
    Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 30(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 12105760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction: identifying and assessing conservation opportunity.
    Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 25382788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
    Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the feasibility of a hypothetical whaling-conservation permit market in Norway.
    Huang B; Abbott JK; Fenichel EP; Muneepeerakul R; Perrings C; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):809-817. PubMed ID: 28234428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans.
    Nel JL; Roux DJ; Driver A; Hill L; Maherry AC; Snaddon K; Petersen CR; Smith-Adao LB; Van Deventer H; Reyers B
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 26041340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.
    Cook CN; Wintle BC; Aldrich SC; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 25381735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.