170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382428)
1. Open fitting: performance verification of receiver in the ear and receiver in the aid.
Mondelli MF; Garcia TM; Hashimoto FM; Rocha AV
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25382428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss.
Mondelli MF; Dos Santos Mde M; José MR
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 26699444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.
Garcia TM; Jacob RT; Mondelli MF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 27383708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of receiver placement on probe microphone, performance, and subjective measures with open canal hearing instruments.
Alworth LN; Plyler PN; Reber MB; Johnstone PM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):249-66. PubMed ID: 20388451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of the audiological outcomes with Retro-X (semi-implantable hearing aid system) and conventional open fitting hearing aids.
Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Stieve M; Winter M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 18365229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two digital hearing aids.
Knebel SB; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 9728723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of sound amplification in self-perception of tinnitus and hearing loss in the elderly.
Araujo Tde M; Iório MC
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 26541231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.
Wardenga N; Snik AFM; Kludt E; Waldmann B; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 32007992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
