367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382827)
1. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accounting for complementarity to maximize monitoring power for species management.
Tulloch AI; Chadès I; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):988-99. PubMed ID: 24073812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.
Auerbach NA; Wilson KA; Tulloch AI; Rhodes JR; Hanson JO; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 26171646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rabbit biocontrol and landscape-scale recovery of threatened desert mammals.
Pedler RD; Brandle R; Read JL; Southgate R; Bird P; Moseby KE
Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):774-82. PubMed ID: 26852773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of surrogate species to cost-effectively prioritize conservation actions.
Ward M; Rhodes JR; Watson JEM; Lefevre J; Atkinson S; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):600-610. PubMed ID: 31691376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
Raymond CM; Brown G
J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using changes in agricultural utility to quantify future climate-induced risk to conservation.
Estes LD; Paroz LL; Bradley BA; Green JM; Hole DG; Holness S; Ziv G; Oppenheimer MG; Wilcove DS
Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):427-37. PubMed ID: 24372589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria.
Keith DA; Mahony M; Hines H; Elith J; Regan TJ; Baumgartner JB; Hunter D; Heard GW; Mitchell NJ; Parris KM; Penman T; Scheele B; Simpson CC; Tingley R; Tracy CR; West M; Akçakaya HR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 24512339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fundamental insights on when social network data are most critical for conservation planning.
Rhodes JR; Guerrero AM; Bodin Ö; Chadès I
Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1463-1472. PubMed ID: 32691916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits to poorly studied taxa of conservation of bird and mammal diversity on islands.
Aslan C; Holmes N; Tershy B; Spatz D; Croll DA
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25065901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs.
Moon K; Marshall N; Cocklin C
J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():292-300. PubMed ID: 23064247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
