These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382906)

  • 1. Frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in detection of glaucoma among glaucoma suspects.
    Patyal S; Kotwal A; Banarji A; Gurunadh VS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2014 Oct; 70(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 25382906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
    Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
    Doozandeh A; Irandoost F; Mirzajani A; Yazdani S; Pakravan M; Esfandiari H
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.
    Meira-Freitas D; Tatham AJ; Lisboa R; Kuang TM; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Medeiros FA
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Feb; 121(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 24289917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    Chiseliţa D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma.
    Kim SA; Park CK; Park HL
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10173. PubMed ID: 35715424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.
    Racette L; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Ng D; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):954-60. PubMed ID: 18326718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Burgansky-Eliash Z; Wollstein G; Patel A; Bilonick RA; Ishikawa H; Kagemann L; Dilworth WD; Schuman JS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 91(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17215267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients.
    Kanadani FN; Mello PA; Dorairaj SK; Kanadani TC
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2014; 8():1323-30. PubMed ID: 25075173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standard automated perimetry versus matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in subjects with ocular hypertension and healthy control subjects.
    Lamparter J; Aliyeva S; Schulze A; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57663. PubMed ID: 23469043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
    Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
    Bayer AU; Erb C
    Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S; Uzun S; Mocan MC; Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.