These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25382906)

  • 21. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2520-7. PubMed ID: 16723465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
    Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
    Hu R; Wang C; Gu Y; Racette L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(7):e2618. PubMed ID: 26886602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of frequency-doubling perimetry with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Ichhpujani P; Gupta A
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 20717056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients.
    Jansonius NM; Heeg GP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 18652580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.
    Horn FK; Scharch V; Mardin CY; Lämmer R; Kremers J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 26883356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structure-function relationship between FDF, FDT, SAP, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma patients.
    Lamparter J; Russell RA; Schulze A; Schuff AC; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 53(12):7553-9. PubMed ID: 23074201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.
    Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Van Buskirk EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):571-81. PubMed ID: 10472963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.