220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25383054)
1. Le fort I maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis.
Combs PD; Harshbarger RJ
Semin Plast Surg; 2014 Nov; 28(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 25383054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD010403. PubMed ID: 30095853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):CD010403. PubMed ID: 27689965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.
Wang XX; Wang X; Yi B; Li ZL; Liang C; Lin Y
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jul; 116(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15988247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Tobolowsky W; Gupta P; Lopez J; Cho R; Mundinger GS; Yang R; Tufaro AP
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):1974-1978. PubMed ID: 31232986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early, Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Modeling Planned, Le Fort I Advancement With Internal Distractors to Treat Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia in Cleft Lip and Palate.
Chang CS; Swanson J; Yu J; Taylor JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):931-934. PubMed ID: 28403134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique.
Dua G; Navin Kumar A; Roy ID; Roy SK
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):746-51. PubMed ID: 24777017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified Le Fort III osteotomy: A simple solution to severe midfacial hypoplasia.
Fariña R; Valladares S; Raposo A; Silva F
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):837-843. PubMed ID: 29636276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia.
Gateno J; Engel ER; Teichgraeber JF; Yamaji KE; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 15635571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relapse rate after surgical treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in non-growing cleft patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang L; Zheng Y; Li N; Chen X; Lu Z; Tong H; Yin N; Song T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 31526673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation Between Speech Outcomes and the Amount of Maxillary Advancement After Orthognathic Surgery (Le Fort I Conventional Osteotomy and Distraction Osteogenesis) in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Chung J; Lim J; Park H; Yoo A; Kim S; Koo Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1855-1858. PubMed ID: 31107383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the Nostril Shape Change After Le Fort I Advancement in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip?
Ganske IM; Tan RA; Langa OC; Calabrese CE; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 78(6):998-1005. PubMed ID: 32057693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction.
Kumar A; Gabbay JS; Nikjoo R; Heller JB; O'Hara CM; Sisodia M; Garri JI; Wilson LS; Kawamoto HK; Bradley JP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(5):1499-509. PubMed ID: 16641719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing cleft: 5-years experience using internal device.
Hirjak D; Reyneke JP; Janec J; Beno M; Kupcova I
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(12):685-690. PubMed ID: 28127963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tooth-borne distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort I in maxillary advancement of cleft lip and palate patients.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Behnaz M; Ghassemi A; Kamalee Z; Perillo L
Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):117-124. PubMed ID: 29388417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biomechanical study of internal midface distraction after different types of maxillary osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate].
Hou M; Shi GY; Pu LC; Song DL; Zhang XZ; Liu CM
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 25(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 20030117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft Tissue Changes in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Anterior Maxillary Distraction versus Conventional Le-Fort I Osteotomy.
Markose E; Paulose J; Paul ET
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Dec; 12(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 24431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Stimulation and evaluation on maxillary distraction osteogenesis using CASSOS 2001].
Zhu M; Qiu WL; Tang YS; Li QY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2002 Sep; 11(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 14983246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Le Fort I Distraction Enough to Treat Severe Midface Hypoplasia?
Goel P; Fahradyan A; Wolfswinkel EM; Jacob L; Yen SL; Urata MM; Hammoudeh JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1716-1720. PubMed ID: 33464771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
