These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384360)
1. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Perdawood SK; Lund T Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer. Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre. Asplund D; Haglind E; Angenete E Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22221401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer]. Chen Y; Chi P Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncological and quality of life outcomes following extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Kamali D; Sharpe A; Musbahi A; Reddy A Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 May; 99(5):402-409. PubMed ID: 28462642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up. Carpelan A; Karvonen J; Varpe P; Rantala A; Kaljonen A; Grönroos J; Huhtinen H Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study. Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trans-perineal minimally invasive approach during extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Zhai ZW; Zhao BC Asian J Surg; 2020 Aug; 43(8):819-825. PubMed ID: 31982269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study. Klein M; Fischer A; Rosenberg J; Gögenur I; Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25211268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision. Jones H; Moran B; Crane S; Hompes R; Cunningham C; Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 27321172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An MRI-based assessment of standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision specimens: time for a patient tailored approach? How P; West NP; Brown G Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 24271159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity. Habr-Gama A; São Julião GP; Mattacheo A; de Campos-Lobato LF; Aleman E; Vailati BB; Gama-Rodrigues J; Perez RO World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2160-2167. PubMed ID: 28265736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome. Zhou X; Sun T; Xie H; Zhang Y; Zeng H; Fu W Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 25704132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yu HC; Peng H; He XS; Zhao RS Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 29(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 24271080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial. Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R; Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic Versus Open Extralevaor Abdominoperineal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Single Institute. Xiao H; Huang R; Li X; Wang Z J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jan; 31(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 32706627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Prytz M; Angenete E; Ekelund J; Haglind E Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 24950793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cheung T; Knight JS; Nichols PH; Pilkington SA; Mirnezami AH Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct; 16(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22777690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]