BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384445)

  • 21. Monitoring the press-fit insertion of an acetabular cup by impact measurements: influence of bone abrasion.
    Michel A; Bosc R; Mathieu V; Hernigou P; Haiat G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):1027-34. PubMed ID: 25258009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Contact surface and pressure load at implant-bone interface in press-fit cups compared to natural hip joints].
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B; Morscher EW
    Orthopade; 1997 Feb; 26(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 9157358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do the cup surface properties influence the initial stability?
    Goriainov V; Jones A; Briscoe A; New A; Dunlop D
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):757-62. PubMed ID: 24269067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limitation of total hip arthroplasty of the acetabular roof by press-fit without screw fixation: discussion of a biomechanical study.
    Kanda A; Kaneko K; Obayashi O; Mogami A; Iwase H
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 May; 23(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23412291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of acetabular cup design on the primary implant stability : an experimental and numerical analysis].
    Zietz C; Fritsche A; Kluess D; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    Orthopade; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1097-105. PubMed ID: 19636530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Basic considerations for determining the amount of press fit in acetabular cup endoprostheses as a function of the elastic bone behavior.
    Winter W; Karl M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Oct; 59(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 24937501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-farrar metal-on-metal hip implants.
    Yew A; Jagatia M; Ensaff H; Jin ZM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 14558645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Factors affecting the primary stability of acetabular components. An in vitro study].
    Pitto RP; Böhner J; Hofmeister V
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Dec; 42(12):363-8. PubMed ID: 9487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Effect of socket preparation on primary stability of an elliptical acetabular component].
    Pitto RP; Hofmeister V
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Sep; 43(9):257-60. PubMed ID: 9785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Allofit cementless acetabular component: five-year experience].
    Hoza P; Pilný J; Kubeš J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 23562260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The influence of different surface treatments on the primary stability of cementless acetabular cups: an in vitro study].
    Schreiner U; Simnacher M; Scheller G; Scharf HP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Jun; 52(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17561785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative in vitro assessment of the primary stability of cementless press-fit acetabular cups.
    Olory B; Havet E; Gabrion A; Vernois J; Mertl P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Feb; 70(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15055315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental analysis of insertion torques and forces of threaded and press-fit acetabular cups by means of ex vivo and in vivo measurements.
    Vogel D; Rathay A; Teufel S; Ellenrieder M; Zietz C; Sander M; Bader R
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(3):155-163. PubMed ID: 29205219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Locking versus standard screw fixation for acetabular cups: is there a difference?
    Heller S; Brosh T; Kosashvili Y; Velkes S; Burg A; Dudkiewicz I
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 May; 133(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 23467767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acetabular cup geometry and bone-implant interference have more influence on initial periprosthetic joint space than joint loading and surgical cup insertion.
    Ong KL; Lehman J; Notz WI; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16524327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro examination of the primary stability of three press-fit acetabular cups under consideration of two different bearing couples.
    Jahnke A; Bott CC; Fonseca Ulloa CA; Jahnke GW; Rickert M; Ishaque BA; Ahmed GA
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 May; 67():49-54. PubMed ID: 30902521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Primary stability of press-fit acetabulum cups using a new acetabulum reamer].
    Hofmeister V; Pitto RP; Schramm M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1999 Dec; 44(12):352-5. PubMed ID: 10675991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Press fit fixation of cementless cups: how much stability do we need indeed?
    Roth A; Winzer T; Sander K; Anders JO; Venbrocks RA
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Mar; 126(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16501986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of acetabular cup initial fixation by using resonance frequency principle.
    Henys P; Capek L; Fencl J; Prochazka E
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Jan; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 25655952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Press-fit versus threaded acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty: Functional and radiological results after five years.
    Ellenrieder M; Bader R; Bergschmidt P; Mittelmeier W
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Mar; 82(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 26984655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.