218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384574)
21. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. GeDi: applying suffix arrays to increase the repertoire of detectable SNVs in tumour genomes.
Coleman I; Corleone G; Arram J; Ng HC; Magnani L; Luk W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):45. PubMed ID: 32024475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Empirical design of a variant quality control pipeline for whole genome sequencing data using replicate discordance.
Adelson RP; Renton AE; Li W; Barzilai N; Atzmon G; Goate AM; Davies P; Freudenberg-Hua Y
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16156. PubMed ID: 31695094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Technical strategy for monozygotic twin discrimination by single-nucleotide variants.
Sun W; Wang Z; Wen S; Huang A; Li H; Jiang L; Feng Q; Fan D; Tian Q; Han D; Liu X
Int J Legal Med; 2024 May; 138(3):767-779. PubMed ID: 38197923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Aligning to the sample-specific reference sequence to optimize the accuracy of next-generation sequencing analysis for hepatitis B virus.
Liu WC; Lin CP; Cheng CP; Ho CH; Lan KL; Cheng JH; Yen CJ; Cheng PN; Wu IC; Li IC; Chang BC; Tseng VS; Chiu YC; Chang TT
Hepatol Int; 2016 Jan; 10(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 26208819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality control for genome-wide association studies.
Gondro C; Lee SH; Lee HK; Porto-Neto LR
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():129-47. PubMed ID: 23756889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. KoVariome: Korean National Standard Reference Variome database of whole genomes with comprehensive SNV, indel, CNV, and SV analyses.
Kim J; Weber JA; Jho S; Jang J; Jun J; Cho YS; Kim HM; Kim H; Kim Y; Chung O; Kim CG; Lee H; Kim BC; Han K; Koh I; Chae KS; Lee S; Edwards JS; Bhak J
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5677. PubMed ID: 29618732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comprehensive fundamental somatic variant calling and quality management strategies for human cancer genomes.
He X; Chen S; Li R; Han X; He Z; Yuan D; Zhang S; Duan X; Niu B
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32510555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reference genotype and exome data from an Australian Aboriginal population for health-based research.
Tang D; Anderson D; Francis RW; Syn G; Jamieson SE; Lassmann T; Blackwell JM
Sci Data; 2016 Apr; 3():160023. PubMed ID: 27070114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of exome variants using the Ion Proton Platform to sequence error-prone regions.
Seo H; Park Y; Min BJ; Seo ME; Kim JH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181304. PubMed ID: 28742110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Method to Evaluate the Quality of Clinical Gene-Panel Sequencing Data for Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection.
Lee C; Bae JS; Ryu GH; Kim NKD; Park D; Chung J; Kyung S; Joung JG; Shin HT; Shin SH; Kim Y; Kim BS; Lee H; Kim KM; Kim JS; Park WY; Son DS
J Mol Diagn; 2017 Sep; 19(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28743024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterizing and interpreting genetic variation from personal genome sequencing.
Johansson AC; Feuk L
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 838():343-67. PubMed ID: 22228021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
Cornish A; Guda C
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimized filtering reduces the error rate in detecting genomic variants by short-read sequencing.
Reumers J; De Rijk P; Zhao H; Liekens A; Smeets D; Cleary J; Van Loo P; Van Den Bossche M; Catthoor K; Sabbe B; Despierre E; Vergote I; Hilbush B; Lambrechts D; Del-Favero J
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 30(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 22178994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Somatic point mutations occurring early in development: a monozygotic twin study.
Li R; Montpetit A; Rousseau M; Wu SY; Greenwood CM; Spector TD; Pollak M; Polychronakos C; Richards JB
J Med Genet; 2014 Jan; 51(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24123875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. STIC: Predicting Single Nucleotide Variants and Tumor Purity in Cancer Genome.
Yuan X; Ma C; Zhao H; Yang L; Wang S; Xi J
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2692-2701. PubMed ID: 32086221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Use of Non-Variant Sites to Improve the Clinical Assessment of Whole-Genome Sequence Data.
Ferrarini A; Xumerle L; Griggio F; Garonzi M; Cantaloni C; Centomo C; Vargas SM; Descombes P; Marquis J; Collino S; Franceschi C; Garagnani P; Salisbury BA; Harvey JM; Delledonne M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132180. PubMed ID: 26147798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of Whole Genome Sequencing Data.
Hübschmann D; Schlesner M
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1956():321-336. PubMed ID: 30779042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Germline contamination and leakage in whole genome somatic single nucleotide variant detection.
Sendorek DH; Caloian C; Ellrott K; Bare JC; Yamaguchi TN; Ewing AD; Houlahan KE; Norman TC; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 29385983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
