These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384605)
1. Use of artificial neural networks to decision making in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S J Neurosurg Sci; 2017 Dec; 61(6):603-611. PubMed ID: 25384605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article. Azimi P; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S; Mohammadi HR J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24438428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prediction of successful surgery outcome in lumbar disc herniation based on artificial neural networks. Azimi P; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S; Mohammadi HR J Neurosurg Sci; 2016 Jun; 60(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 27150542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of stenosis ratio as a predictor of surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Mohammadi HR; Azimi P; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S J Neurosurg Sci; 2016 Sep; 60(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 27402405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision-making process in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S; Montazeri A J Neurosurg Sci; 2017 Aug; 61(4):388-394. PubMed ID: 25069540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of artificial neural networks to predict recurrent lumbar disk herniation. Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E161-5. PubMed ID: 25353200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of pain sensitivity on the symptom severity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Kim HJ; Suh BG; Lee DB; Lee GW; Kim DW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS Pain Physician; 2013; 16(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 23511680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion. Willems P Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A valid model for predicting responsible nerve roots in lumbar degenerative disease with diagnostic doubt. Li X; Bai X; Wu Y; Ruan D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():128. PubMed ID: 26979618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability]. Gu GF; Zhang HL; He SS; Gu X; Zhang LG; Ding Y; Jia JB; Zhou X Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1081-5. PubMed ID: 22333447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis. Tomkins-Lane CC; Battié MC; Macedo LG Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):1936-43. PubMed ID: 24291033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction. den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Classification Criteria: A New Tool. Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S Asian Spine J; 2015 Jun; 9(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 26097655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An outcome measure of functionality in patients with lumber spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS). Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Montazeri A BMC Neurol; 2012 Sep; 12():101. PubMed ID: 23006983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis. Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]