These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384605)

  • 21. Twelve-month results of a clinical pilot study utilizing pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Mobasser JP; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 23373562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Surgeon Rating of Severity of Stenosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Dural Cross-Sectional Area, and Functional Outcome Scores.
    Marawar SV; Ordway NR; Madom IA; Tallarico RA; Palumbo M; Metkar U; Wang D; Huang D; Lavelle WF
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():165-170. PubMed ID: 27586177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: A survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac.
    Schizas C; Kulik G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jan; 94(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 22219255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sasai K; Umeda M; Maruyama T; Wakabayashi E; Iida H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec; 9(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 19035747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
    Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation between clinical scoring systems and quantitative MRI parameters in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gupta S; Bansal T; Kashyap A; Sural S
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2022 Dec; 35():102050. PubMed ID: 36317084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes of Surgery in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Comparison of Three Types of Stenosis on MRI.
    Azimi P; Azhari S; Benzel EC; Khayat Kashany H; Nayeb Aghaei H; Mohammadi HR; Ebrahimi M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158041. PubMed ID: 27333058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Deep learning-based detection of lumbar spinal canal stenosis using convolutional neural networks.
    Suzuki H; Kokabu T; Yamada K; Ishikawa Y; Yabu A; Yanagihashi Y; Hyakumachi T; Tachi H; Shimizu T; Endo T; Ohnishi T; Ukeba D; Nagahama K; Takahata M; Sudo H; Iwasaki N
    Spine J; 2024 Nov; 24(11):2086-2101. PubMed ID: 38909909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
    Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Cleland JA; Whitman JM; Houser JL; Wainner RS; Childs JD
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):921-31. PubMed ID: 22749295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.