These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384644)

  • 1. The hard fall effect: high working memory capacity leads to a higher, but less robust short-term memory performance.
    Thomassin N; Gonthier C; Guerraz M; Roulin JL
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 25384644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
    Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
    Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: a comparison of strategy assessment methods.
    Dunlosky J; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1227-45. PubMed ID: 17676555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modality independence of order coding in working memory: Evidence from cross-modal order interference at recall.
    Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):161-79. PubMed ID: 25801664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory and sequence learning in the Hebb Digits task: awareness is predicted by individual differences in operation span.
    Weitz D; O'Shea G; Zook N; Needham W
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 21506450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory.
    Morrison AB; Rosenbaum GM; Fair D; Chein JM
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):922-36. PubMed ID: 27038310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The functional neuroanatomy of multitasking: combining dual tasking with a short term memory task.
    Deprez S; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters R; Emsell L; Amant F; Sunaert S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2251-60. PubMed ID: 23938320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A preliminary investigation of the running digit span as a test of working memory.
    Jahanshahi M; Saleem T; Ho AK; Fuller R; Dirnberger G
    Behav Neurol; 2008; 20(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 19491471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation.
    Lilienthal L; Rose NS; Tamez E; Myerson J; Hale S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 25921723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional refreshing moderates the word frequency effect in immediate and delayed recall tasks.
    Abadie M; Camos V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 29756215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.