These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25384851)

  • 1. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple, flexible, and effective covariate-adaptive treatment allocation procedure.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3775-87. PubMed ID: 23637002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Unbiased estimation of factorial effect by using analysis of covariance or propensity score method for observational studies in laboratory medicine].
    Inada M
    Rinsho Byori; 2012 Jul; 60(7):689-97. PubMed ID: 22973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects.
    Franklin JM; Rassen JA; Ackermann D; Bartels DB; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(10):1685-99. PubMed ID: 24323618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian adaptive randomization design incorporating propensity score-matched historical controls.
    Sawamoto R; Oba K; Matsuyama Y
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 21(5):1074-1089. PubMed ID: 35278032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test.
    Luellen JK; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Eval Rev; 2005 Dec; 29(6):530-58. PubMed ID: 16244051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Squeezing the balloon: propensity scores and unmeasured covariate balance.
    Brooks JM; Ohsfeldt RL
    Health Serv Res; 2013 Aug; 48(4):1487-507. PubMed ID: 23216471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.