These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25386210)

  • 1. Comparison of CT-Number and Gray Scale Value of Different Dental Materials and Hard Tissues in CT and CBCT.
    Emadi N; Safi Y; Akbarzadeh Bagheban A; Asgary S
    Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 25386210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Hounsfield unit in CT scan with the gray level in cone-beam CT.
    Razi T; Emamverdizadeh P; Nilavar N; Razi S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2019; 13(3):177-182. PubMed ID: 31857863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: Comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners.
    Esmaeili F; Johari M; Haddadi P
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 May; 10(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 24019808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the gray level of restorative materials using cone-beam computed tomography: A cross-sectional study.
    Hadadi P; Ostovarrad F; Nikbin A; Ranjzad H; Ghasemi F; Nemati S
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 30328304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.
    Bastami F; Shahab S; Parsa A; Abbas FM; Noori Kooshki MH; Namdari M; Lisar HA; Rafiei T; Fahimipour F; Salehi M; Jafari M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29086089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of densitometry of two cone beam computed tomography equipment in comparison with computed tomography.
    Haghanifar S; Yousefi S; Moudi E; Abesi F; Bijani A; Moghadamnia AA; Nabahati M
    Electron Physician; 2017 May; 9(5):4384-4390. PubMed ID: 28713511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
    Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An
    Patrick S; Birur NP; Gurushanth K; Raghavan AS; Gurudath S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 28393820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expansion of gutta-percha in contact with various concentrations of zinc oxide-eugenol sealer: a three-dimensional volumetric study.
    Chandrasekhar V; Morishetty PK; Metla SL; Raju RV
    J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 21496674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT.
    Razi T; Niknami M; Alavi Ghazani F
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2014; 8(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 25093055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of teeth prepared with rotary system, filled with single cone gutta-percha and laterally condensed with zinc oxide eugenol and resin based (AH26) sealers to that of Resilon.
    Vishwanathan PK; Muliyar S; Chavan P; Reddy PM; Reddy TP; Nilawar S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):773-81. PubMed ID: 23404002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expansion of Gutta-percha in contact with various concentrations of zinc oxide-eugenol sealer: A three-dimensional volumetric study using spiral computed tomography.
    Tilakchand M; Jain A; Naik B
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 27563178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Avsever H; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retreatability of 2 mineral trioxide aggregate-based root canal sealers: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Neelakantan P; Grotra D; Sharma S
    J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):893-6. PubMed ID: 23791258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.
    Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment.
    Valiyaparambil JV; Yamany I; Ortiz D; Shafer DM; Pendrys D; Freilich M; Mallya SM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1271-7. PubMed ID: 23057044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.