These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25386484)

  • 21. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
    Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
    Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the timing of insertion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) copper T380A on expulsion rates.
    Dorairajan G; Ashok VM; Veena P
    Indian J Med Res; 2023 Apr; 157(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 37282395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section.
    Bhutta SZ; Butt IJ; Bano K
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):527-30. PubMed ID: 21914407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Continuation of Copper T in Immediate Postplacental, Immediate Postabortal and Interval Period of Insertion.
    Nath B; Gaikwad HS; Nagpal K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2022 Feb; 72(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 35125737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study.
    Goldthwaite LM; Sheeder J; Hyer J; Tocce K; Teal SB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):674.e1-674.e8. PubMed ID: 28826801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women.
    Chen JH; Wu SC; Shao WQ; Zou MH; Hu J; Cong L; Miao L; Wang C; Dong J; Gao J; Xiao BL
    Contraception; 1998 Jun; 57(6):371-9. PubMed ID: 9693396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Acceptance of Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Among Women Who Receive Focused Family Planning Counseling in the Antenatal Period Compared to Those Who Receive Routine Counseling: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Najan A; Dixit P; Bhalerao A
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40344. PubMed ID: 37456407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device.
    Hinz EK; Murthy A; Wang B; Ryan N; Ades V
    Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):101-105. PubMed ID: 31108053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device.
    Kaneshiro B; Aeby T
    Int J Womens Health; 2010 Aug; 2():211-20. PubMed ID: 21072313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intrauterine Copper Device (CuT380A) as a Contraceptive Method in the Indian Context: Acceptability, Safety and Efficacy Depending on the Timing of Insertion.
    Gupta P; Gupta MM; Sharma R
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2018 Apr; 68(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 29662283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Postplacental intrauterine device insertion at a teaching hospital.
    Jatlaoui TC; Marcus M; Jamieson DJ; Goedken P; Cwiak C
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 24565735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: a systematic review.
    Sonalkar S; Kapp N
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015 Feb; 20(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 25397890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
    Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
    Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Importance of the delivery-to-insertion interval in immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: A secondary analysis.
    Lerma K; Bhamrah R; Singh S; Blumenthal PD
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 May; 149(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 32037531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices.
    Whitaker AK; Chen BA
    Contraception; 2018 Jan; 97(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 28987293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interactions between intrauterine contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries.
    Farr G; Rivera R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 1442918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate postplacental insertion and fixation of the CuFix postpartum implant system.
    Van Kets H; Parewijck W; Van der Pas H; Batar I; Creatsas G; Koumantakis K; Thiery M
    Contraception; 1993 Oct; 48(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 8222662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.