115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25387721)
1. Operative efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific cutting guides in total knee replacement.
Nankivell M; West G; Pourgiezis N
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Jun; 85(6):452-5. PubMed ID: 25387721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system.
Nakahara H; Matsuda S; Moro-oka TA; Okazaki K; Tashiro Y; Iwamoto Y
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1119-22. PubMed ID: 22019323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement.
Chareancholvanich K; Narkbunnam R; Pornrattanamaneewong C
Bone Joint J; 2013 Mar; 95-B(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 23450020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.
Lustig S; Scholes CJ; Oussedik SI; Kinzel V; Coolican MR; Parker DA
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 23151366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation].
Köster G; Biró C
Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):302-13. PubMed ID: 27025869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific guides: Is there a learning curve?
Chinnappa J; Chen DB; Harris IA; MacDessi SJ
Knee; 2015 Dec; 22(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 26120064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Tibesku CO; Haas SB; Saunders C; Harwood DA
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4379-4393. PubMed ID: 36449066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique].
Perlick L; Bäthis H; Lerch K; Lüring C; Tingart M; Grifka J
Z Rheumatol; 2004 Apr; 63(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 15112094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential versus automated cutting guides in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Koulalis D; O'Loughlin PF; Plaskos C; Kendoff D; Cross MB; Pearle AD
Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 20837395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Kim TK; Chang CB; Kang YG; Chung BJ; Cho HJ; Seong SC
Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19581096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resection accuracy of patient-specific cutting guides in total knee replacement.
Wernecke GC; Taylor S; Wernecke P; MacDessi SJ; Chen DB
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Nov; 87(11):921-924. PubMed ID: 28853192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of custom cutting guides on patient satisfaction and residual symptoms following total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Nunley RM; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Barrack RL
Knee; 2016 Jan; 23(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 26746042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.
Seon JK; Park HW; Yoo SH; Song EK
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3678-3683. PubMed ID: 25399345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Total knee arthroplasty with the use of patient specific instruments. The VISIONAIRE system].
Tibesku CO
Orthopade; 2016 Apr; 45(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 26952362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.
Asada S; Mori S; Matsushita T; Nakagawa K; Tsukamoto I; Akagi M
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1238-43. PubMed ID: 25199712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study.
Predescu V; Prescura C; Olaru R; Savin L; Botez P; Deleanu B
Int Orthop; 2017 Jul; 41(7):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 27995304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
