These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25387767)

  • 21. Cues to deception.
    DePaulo BM; Lindsay JJ; Malone BE; Muhlenbruck L; Charlton K; Cooper H
    Psychol Bull; 2003 Jan; 129(1):74-118. PubMed ID: 12555795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deception Detection and Truth Detection Are Dependent on Different Cognitive and Emotional Traits: An Investigation of Emotional Intelligence, Theory of Mind, and Attention.
    Stewart SLK; Wright C; Atherton C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 May; 45(5):794-807. PubMed ID: 30264653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Deception detection: State of the art and future prospects.
    Masip J
    Psicothema; 2017 May; 29(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28438235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning to Detect Deception from Evasive Answers and Inconsistencies across Repeated Interviews: A Study with Lay Respondents and Police Officers.
    Masip J; Martínez C; Blandón-Gitlin I; Sánchez N; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2207. PubMed ID: 29354078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nonverbal cues to deception: insights from a mock crime scenario in a Chinese sample.
    Li H; Song H; Li M; Li H
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1331653. PubMed ID: 38406306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidence Can Be Used to Discriminate Between Accurate and Inaccurate Lie Decisions.
    Smith AM; Leach AM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(6):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 31539484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contextual considerations for deception production and detection in forensic interviews.
    Markowitz DM; Hancock JT; Woodworth MT; Ely M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1134052. PubMed ID: 36824303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
    Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. T-Pattern Analysis and Cognitive Load Manipulation to Detect Low-Stake Lies: An Exploratory Study.
    Diana B; Zurloni V; Elia M; Cavalera C; Realdon O; Jonsson GK; Anguera MT
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():257. PubMed ID: 29551986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
    Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.