BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25387859)

  • 1. Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treated teeth: findings from a survey with dentists.
    Sarkis-Onofre R; Pereira-Cenci T; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland.
    Kon M; Zitzmann NU; Weiger R; Krastl G
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2013; 123(12):1076-88. PubMed ID: 24554584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey of dentists to determine contemporary use of endodontic posts.
    Ahmed SN; Donovan TE; Ghuman T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):642-645. PubMed ID: 27881309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany.
    Naumann M; Neuhaus KW; Kölpin M; Seemann R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 26082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment concepts for restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A nationwide survey of dentists in Germany.
    Naumann M; Kiessling S; Seemann R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 17098496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior composite restorations in clinical practice: findings from a survey with general dental practitioners.
    Demarco FF; Baldissera RA; Madruga FC; Simões RC; Lund RG; Correa MB; Cenci MS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 24473714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisors with Class III restorations: An in vitro study.
    Abduljawad M; Samran A; Kadour J; Karzoun W; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27863859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of crown-root restorations in non-vital teeth. Survey of dentists in the city of Abidjan].
    Sinan AA; Assoumou-Adou NM; Avoaka-Boni MC; Djirabou S; Abouattier-Mansilla E
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Jun; 34(134):11-5. PubMed ID: 22003804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up.
    Sarkis-Onofre R; Jacinto RC; Boscato N; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 24530920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-endodontic treatment of incisors and premolars among dental practitioners in Saarland: an interactive Web-based survey.
    Mitov G; Dörr M; Nothdurft FP; Draenert F; Pospiech PR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1029-37. PubMed ID: 25280511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.
    Franco EB; Lins do Valle A; Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL; Rubo JH; Pereira JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 24161260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinical experience time and postgraduate training influence the choice of materials for posterior restorations? Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists.
    Nascimento GG; Correa MB; Opdam N; Demarco FF
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):642-6. PubMed ID: 24474363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of current practices among general dental practitioners in Manchester in 2002.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2003 Jul; 10(3):87-92. PubMed ID: 12929337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restorative preferences and choices of dentists and students for restoring endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of survey studies.
    Girotto LPS; Dotto L; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A; Sarkis-Onofre R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):489-489.e5. PubMed ID: 32981715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth.
    Grandini S; Goracci C; Tay FR; Grandini R; Ferrari M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 16220805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden.
    Eckerbom M; Magnusson T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 11484572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.
    Balkaya MC; Birdal IS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 23684279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.