178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25387859)
41. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts.
Başaran EG; Ayna E; Halifeoğlu M
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):239-51. PubMed ID: 22475467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements.
Marchan S; Coldero L; Whiting R; Barclay S
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16429187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts.
Qing H; Zhu Z; Chao Y; Zhang W
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 17341377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study.
Ambica K; Mahendran K; Talwar S; Verma M; Padmini G; Periasamy R
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 23228265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: an in vitro study.
Valdivia AD; Raposo LH; Simamoto-Júnior PC; Novais VR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 22944310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Performance of CAD/CAM fabricated fiber posts in oval-shaped root canals: An in vitro study.
Tsintsadze N; Juloski J; Carrabba M; Tricarico M; Goracci C; Vichi A; Ferrari M; Grandini S
Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):248-254. PubMed ID: 29178727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Retentive strength of fiber-reinforced composite posts with composite resin cores: Effect of remaining coronal structure and root canal dentin conditioning protocols.
Saker S; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):856-61. PubMed ID: 26384532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The preprosthetic preparation of the endodontically treated abutment tooth. Post and core technique: a questionnaire analysis].
Tinner D; Marinello C; Kerschbaum T
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 11419399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching.
Brunton PA; Burke FJ; Sharif MO; Creanor S; Hosey MT; Mannocci F; Wilson NH
Br Dent J; 2012 Jan; 212(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 22281627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 28422598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reliability of fiber post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro.
Bitter K; Perdigão J; Exner M; Neumann K; Kielbassa A; Sterzenbach G
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 22339386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An up to 3-Year Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Glass Fiber Posts and Composite Cores with Gold Alloy-Based Posts and Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Zicari F; Van Meerbeek B; Debels E; Lesaffre E; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21716975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of ferrule, post system, and length on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated anterior teeth.
Santos-Filho PC; Veríssimo C; Soares PV; Saltarelo RC; Soares CJ; Marcondes Martins LR
J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 24332002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth.
Pereira JR; do Valle AL; Shiratori FK; Ghizoni JS; Bonfante EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1225-30. PubMed ID: 24836285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of bonded area and/or fiber post placement on the fracture strengths of resin-core reconstructions for pulpless teeth.
Nakajima M; Kanno T; Komada W; Miura H; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2010 Dec; 23(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 21344826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
