161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25388073)
21. Influence of treatment concept, velopharyngoplasty, gender and age on hypernasality in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate.
Joos U; Wermker K; Kruse-Löesler B; Kleinheinz J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 34(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 17157520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nasometric discrimination of hypernasality and turbulent nasal airflow.
Karnell MP
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Mar; 32(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 7748876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of velopharyngeal function after relocation pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea.
Li HY; Lee LA; Fang TJ; Lin WN; Lin WY
Laryngoscope; 2010 May; 120(5):1069-73. PubMed ID: 20155798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nasalance scores of children with repaired cleft palate who exhibit normal velopharyngeal closure during aerodynamic testing.
Zajac DJ
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2013 Aug; 22(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 23813202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Tonar II, pressure-flow, and listener judgments of hypernasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function.
Dalston RM; Warren DW
Cleft Palate J; 1986 Apr; 23(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 3516454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency: intermediate and longer-term perceptual speech and nasometric outcomes.
Nabi S; Tan S; Husein M; Dworschak-Stokan A; Bureau Y; Matic D
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 21453652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraoperative suction test as a predictor of velopharyngeal competence.
Baker S; Millard DR
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Sep; 30(5):452-3. PubMed ID: 8218308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-cleft causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction: implications for treatment.
Kummer AW; Marshall JL; Wilson MM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Mar; 79(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 25604261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of inter-judge agreement on perceptual judgment of nasality.
Scarmagnani RH; Oliveira AC; Fukushiro AP; Salgado MH; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
Codas; 2014; 26(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 25388067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nasalance scores in patients with a modified Honig velopharyngeal flap before and after operation.
Haapanen ML
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1992; 26(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 1470878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Smith BE; Kuehn DP
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 18(2):251-61; quiz 266-7. PubMed ID: 17414269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nasalance and nasality at experimental velopharyngeal openings in palatal prosthesis: a case study.
Lima-Gregio AM; Marino VC; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Barbosa PA; Aferri HC; Dutka Jde C
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 22230996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Normal nasalance for the German language. Nasometric values for clinical use in patients with cleft lip and palate].
Küttner C; Schönweiler R; Seeberger B; Dempf R; Lisson J; Ptok M
HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12589422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores.
Bettens K; Bruneel L; Maryn Y; De Bodt M; Luyten A; Van Lierde KM
J Commun Disord; 2018; 76():11-20. PubMed ID: 30071470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 Jul; 36(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 10426599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Methods of assessing speech in relation to velopharyngeal function.
Van Demark D; Bzoch K; Daly D; Fletcher S; McWilliams BJ; Pannbacker M; Weinberg B
Cleft Palate J; 1985 Oct; 22(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 3863726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
