These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25388073)

  • 41. Objectivating nasality in healthy and velopharyngeal insufficient children with the Nasalance Acquisition System (NasalView). Defining minimal required speech tasks assessing normative values for Dutch language.
    Hogen Esch TT; Dejonckere PH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 68(8):1039-46. PubMed ID: 15236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
    Haapanen ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Sweeney T; Sell D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores.
    Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of Voice Focus on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speech.
    de Boer G; Bressmann T
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):705-710. PubMed ID: 26494180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD; Kummer AW; Alrawashdeh M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 28879790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcome of treatment regarding articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish adults with unilateral and bilateral cleft palate.
    Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Baetens I; Schrauwen V; Van Cauwenberge P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 12697981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scaling for Assessment of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Baylis A; Chapman K; Whitehill TL;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 25322442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Nasalance measures in German-speaking cleft patients.
    Swennen GR; Grimaldi H; Upheber J; Kramer FJ; Dempf R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):158-64; discussion 164. PubMed ID: 14704583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predictors of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction in Individuals With Cleft Palate Following Surgical Maxillary Advancement: Clinical and Tomographic Assessments.
    de Medeiros-Santana MNL; Perry JL; Yaedú RYF; Trindade-Suedam IK; Yamashita RP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Nov; 56(10):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 31213072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Speech in children with an isolated cleft palate: A longitudinal perspective.
    Persson C; Lohmander A; Elander A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 May; 43(3):295-309. PubMed ID: 16681402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Speech outcomes and velopharyngeal function after surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in individuals with signs of velocardiofacial syndrome.
    Brandão GR; de Souza Freitas JA; Genaro KF; Yamashita RP; Fukushiro AP; Lauris JR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1736-42. PubMed ID: 21959422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Perceptual and instrumental assessment of velopharyngeal function in asymptomatic submucous cleft palate].
    Miguel HC; Genaro KF; Trindade IE
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 17461353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children.
    Watterson T; Hinton J; McFarlane S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8849861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores.
    Lewis KE; Watterson T; Quint T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 11108528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment.
    Dalston RM; Seaver EJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jan; 29(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 1547246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model.
    Bunton K; Story BH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Nov; 49(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 21970695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nasalance, nasality, voice, and articulation after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Van Borsel J; Moerman M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Laryngoscope; 2002 May; 112(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 12150621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.