These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25388073)
61. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. Watterson T; McFarlane SC; Wright DS J Commun Disord; 1993 Apr; 26(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 8340487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. SISL (ScreeningsInstrument Schisis Leuven): assessment of cleft palate speech, resonance and myofunction. Breuls M; Sell D; Manders E; Boulet E; Vander Poorten V B-ENT; 2006; 2 Suppl 4():71-84. PubMed ID: 17366851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate. Kummer AW Clin Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 41(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 24607192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Velopharyngeal incompetence in patients with cleft palate, flexible video pharyngoscopy and perceptual speech assessment: a correlational pilot study. Rajan S; Kurien M; Gupta AK; Mathews SS; Albert RR; Tychicus D J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Nov; 128(11):986-90. PubMed ID: 25335572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Effects of nasal port area on perception of nasality and measures of nasalance based on computational modeling. Bunton K Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Jan; 52(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 24437587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study. de Boer G; Marino VCC; Dutka JCR; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Bressmann T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 Apr; 57(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 31537110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery. Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods. Brancamp TU; Lewis KE; Watterson T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Nov; 47(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 20500059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Evaluation of Speech and Resonance for Children with Craniofacial Anomalies. Kummer AW Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2016 Nov; 24(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 27712812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Effect of method of cleft palate repair on the quality of speech at the age of 6 years. Haapanen ML Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1995 Sep; 29(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 8539568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Hardin MA; Van Demark DR; Morris HL; Payne MM Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jul; 29(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 1643065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Nasality Severity Index 2.0: Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality. Bettens K; Van Lierde KM; Corthals P; Luyten A; Wuyts FL Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e60-70. PubMed ID: 25794017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Investigation of postoperative hypernasality after superiorly based posterior pharyngeal flap. Shin YJ; Kim Y Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 40(1):23. PubMed ID: 30202766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Training speech pathology students in the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate: Reliability results and the students' perspective. Bruneel L; Danhieux A; Van Lierde K Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 157():111145. PubMed ID: 35468487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effect of perceptive-auditory training on the classification of speech hypernasality. Manicardi FT; Dutka JCR; Guerra TA; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Chagas EFB; Marino VCC Codas; 2023; 35(6):e20220069. PubMed ID: 37729318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Normative nasalance scores in the production of words and syllables for Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Sampaio-Teixeira ACM; Oliveira DN; Yamashita RP; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IEK Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(12):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 30894033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Nasalance scores in wearers of a palatal lift prosthesis in comparison with normative data for Japanese. Tachimura T; Kotani Y; Wada T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 May; 41(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 15151451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]