These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25388073)

  • 81. Surgical outcome of pharyngeal flap surgery and intravelar veloplasty on the velopharyngeal function.
    Barbosa DA; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2013; 25(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 24408549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.
    Witt PD; O'Daniel TG; Marsh JL; Grames LM; Muntz HR; Pilgram TK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Apr; 99(5):1287-96; discussion 1297-300. PubMed ID: 9105355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Normative data on nasalance scores for Farsi speaking children: Influence of age, gender and phonetic context.
    Saber-Moghadam R; Faham M; Ghavami FS; Ghayoumi-Anaraki Z
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109680. PubMed ID: 31536853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Foley-Homan N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 May; 36(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 10342612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Nasometric and aerodynamic outcome analysis of pharyngeal flap surgery for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Fukushiro AP; Trindade IE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1647-51. PubMed ID: 21959405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. [Proposal for velopharyngeal function rating in a speech perceptual assessment].
    Trindade IE; Genaro KF; Yamashita RP; Miguel HC; Fukushiro AP
    Pro Fono; 2005; 17(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 16909536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.
    Sescleifer AM; Francoisse CA; Webber JC; Rector JD; Lin AY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227686. PubMed ID: 31917818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Artificial neural network analysis to assess hypernasality in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
    de Bruijn M; ten Bosch L; Kuik DJ; Langendijk JA; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw I
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Dec; 36(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 21864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Application of linear discriminant analysis to the nasometric assessment of resonance disorders: a pilot study.
    de Boer G; Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Mar; 52(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 25714268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Some acoustic evidence for vocal abuse in adult speakers with repaired cleft palate.
    Leder SB; Lerman JW
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Jul; 95(7 Pt 1):837-40. PubMed ID: 4010425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Velopharyngeal Gap Size During Sustained Vowel Production Correlates With Perceptual Ratings of Hypernasality in Connected Speech.
    Williams JL; Perry JL; Bunton K; Cordero KN; Snodgrass TD; Singh DJ; Temkit H; Sitzman TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 67(9):2977-2986. PubMed ID: 39173051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Nasalance scores of Brazilian Portuguese speakers at 5 years of age.
    Oliveira DN; Sampaio-Teixeira ACM; Alvarenga BG; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP; Trindade IEK
    Codas; 2017 May; 29(3):e20160197. PubMed ID: 28538832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.
    Park M; Baek WS; Lee E; Koh KS; Kim BK; Baek R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Feb; 67(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 24211114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Recent progress in treating patients with cleft palate.
    Kawano M; Isshiki N; Honjo I; Kojima H; Kurata K; Tanokuchi F; Kido N; Isobe M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(3-4):117-38. PubMed ID: 9256534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
    Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
    Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Hypernasality in the presence of "adequate" velopharyngeal closure.
    Warren DW; Dalston RM; Mayo R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Mar; 30(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 8452835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The effect of hypertrophied tonsils on the velopharyngeal function in children with normal palate.
    Abdel-Aziz M; El-Fouly M; Nassar A; Kamel A; Kamel A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 119():59-62. PubMed ID: 30677628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Investigations of a pressure-sensitive theory of marginal velopharyngeal inadequacy.
    Karnell MP; Schultz K; Canady J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jul; 38(4):346-57. PubMed ID: 11420015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Automatic identification of hypernasality in normal and cleft lip and palate patients with acoustic analysis of speech.
    Golabbakhsh M; Abnavi F; Kadkhodaei Elyaderani M; Derakhshandeh F; Khanlar F; Rong P; Kuehn DP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):929. PubMed ID: 28253654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.