These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25389198)

  • 1. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Usefulness of Gaze Tracking as an Index of Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6233-6. PubMed ID: 26431476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.
    Asaoka R; Fujino Y; Aoki S; Matsuura M; Murata H
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 32672604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relationship Between Visual Acuity and the Reproducibility of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucoma Patients.
    Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 56(9):5630-5. PubMed ID: 26313298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association between ocular surface measurements with visual field reliability indices and gaze tracking results in preperimetric glaucoma.
    Arai T; Murata H; Matsuura M; Usui T; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 102(4):525-530. PubMed ID: 28765147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Usefulness of Humphrey Perimetry Gaze Tracking for Evaluating Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Hirasawa H; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 56(13):7801-7805. PubMed ID: 26650899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
    Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
    Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fiber layer in perimetrically unaffected eyes of glaucoma patients.
    Reus NJ; Lemij HG
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2199-203. PubMed ID: 15582074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Usefulness of gaze tracking during perimetry in glaucomatous eyes].
    Kunimatsu S; Suzuki Y; Shirato S; Araie M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Oct; 103(10):748-53. PubMed ID: 10554550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting Global Test-Retest Variability of Visual Fields in Glaucoma.
    Choi EY; Li D; Fan Y; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Ramulu P; Yousefi S; De Moraes CG; Wellik SR; Myers JS; Bex PJ; Elze T; Wang M
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2021; 4(4):390-399. PubMed ID: 33310194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Pointwise Linear Regression With Binomial Test in the Central 10 Degrees.
    Asano S; Murata H; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Asaoka R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 199():140-149. PubMed ID: 30465746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard Reliability and Gaze Tracking Metrics in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspects.
    Camp AS; Long CP; Patella VM; Proudfoot JA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 234():91-98. PubMed ID: 34280366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clustering visual field test points based on rates of progression to improve the prediction of future damage.
    Hirasawa K; Murata H; Hirasawa H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 55(11):7681-5. PubMed ID: 25342611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.