340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25390739)
1. High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers.
Alpern JD; Stauffer WM; Kesselheim AS
N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(20):1859-62. PubMed ID: 25390739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers.
Uhl K; Peters JR; Flanagan K
N Engl J Med; 2015 Feb; 372(7):685-6. PubMed ID: 25671270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers.
Kesselheim AS; Alpern JD; Stauffer WM
N Engl J Med; 2015 Feb; 372(7):686. PubMed ID: 25671269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sword or shield? An overview and competitive analysis of the marketing of "authorized generics".
Zain S
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(4):739-77. PubMed ID: 18557229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
Paine CS
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks.
Balto DA
Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
Carrier MA
Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RX for nosebleed prices.
Greenwald J
Time; 2001 May; 157(20):42-3. PubMed ID: 11383109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Settlements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies: a reasonable antitrust analysis of reverse payments.
Yvon AM
Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Dec; 75(3):1883-912. PubMed ID: 17312596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reanalyzing reverse payment settlements: a solution to the patentee's dilemma.
Wang Z
Cornell Law Rev; 2014 Jul; 99(5):1227-58. PubMed ID: 25112001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Generic drugs: the stalling game.
Consum Rep; 2001 Jul; 66(7):36-40. PubMed ID: 11725791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The wake of FTC v. Actavis: practical implications on the pharmaceutical industry.
Ritter M; Tempesta J; Ragusa P
Pharm Pat Anal; 2014 Jul; 3(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 25291307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The "reverse payment paradox": an overview of the legality of reverse exclusionary payments in the pharmaceutical industry.
Brockmeier MS
Health Care Law Mon; 2010 Mar; 2010(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 20329564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term Medicaid excess payments from alleged price manipulation of generic lorazepam.
Bian B; Gorevski E; Kelton CM; Guo JJ; Martin Boone JE
J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 Sep; 18(7):506-15. PubMed ID: 22971204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bib Pharma Monopoly: Why Consumers Keep Landing on "Park Place" and How the Game is Rigged.
Levy MS
Am Univ Law Rev; 2016; 66(1):247-303. PubMed ID: 28225582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Authorized generics.
Glass G
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2005 Dec; 4(12):953-4. PubMed ID: 16370080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Antitrust, Market Exclusivity, and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Sinha MS; Curfman GD; Carrier MA
JAMA; 2018 Jun; 319(22):2271-2272. PubMed ID: 29801104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Branded drug reformulation: the next brand vs. generic antitrust battleground.
Amoresano GV
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17444032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Drug's 5000% price rise puts spotlight on soaring US drug costs.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h5114. PubMed ID: 26404904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The FTC v. Actavis roadmap: a guide to properly applying the rule of reason standard in reverse payment cases.
Sharkey N
J Leg Med; 2014; 35(3):445-66. PubMed ID: 25207633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
