These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25390868)
1. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone. Torabi K; Pour SR; Ahangari AH; Ghodsi S Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 25390868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements. Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study. dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator. Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Pour SR; Ghodsi S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 23151700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of the ability of computerized axiography to reproduce occlusal contacts. Franklin P; McLelland R; Brunton P Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20397498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Articulator-related registration--a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator. Pröschel P; Morneburg T; Hugger A; Kordass B; Ottl P; Niedermeier W; Wichmann M Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 12066493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation. Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study. Goyal MK; Goyal S Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles: an in vivo study. Hernandez AI; Jasinevicius TR; Kaleinikova Z; Sadan A Cranio; 2010 Jan; 28(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20158010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators. Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Tabibian Y; Gazit E J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 25(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 9578229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of recording horizontal condylar inclination and Bennett angle with the Cadiax compact. Celar AG; Tamaki K J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1076-81. PubMed ID: 12453262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided versus unguided mandibular movement for duplicating intraoral eccentric tooth contacts in the articulator. Celar AG; Tamaki K; Nitsche S; Schneider B J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jan; 81(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 9878970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder. Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems. Hicks ST; Wood DP Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements. Wood DP; Korne PH Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between inclination of occlusal plane and masticatory movement. Ogawa T; Koyano K; Suetsugu T J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9540306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Articulators, face bows and interocclusal records. Quinlan Paul J Ir Dent Assoc; 2016; 62(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 27197370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Bennett angle. Clinical comparison of different recording methods. Boulos PJ; Adib SM; Naltchayan LJ N Y State Dent J; 2008 Mar; 74(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 18450187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The intraoral determination of the sagittal condyle path inclination during face-bow recording]. Bernard N; Utz KH; Schmitt L Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7855576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]