BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25391489)

  • 1. The potential for a generally applicable mapping model between QLQ-C30 and SF-6D in patients with different cancers: a comparison of regression-based methods.
    Kontodimopoulos N
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1535-44. PubMed ID: 25391489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
    Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting SF-6D from the European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire scores in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Rowen D
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 23538190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.
    Lamu AN; Olsen JA
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2823-2839. PubMed ID: 30173314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping QLQ-C30 Onto EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D-V2 in Patients With Colorectal and Breast Cancer From a Developing Country.
    Yousefi M; Nahvijou A; Sari AA; Ameri H
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():57-66. PubMed ID: 33508752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping the Chinese Version of the EORTC QLQ-BR53 Onto the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Scores.
    Liu T; Li S; Wang M; Sun Q; Chen G
    Patient; 2020 Oct; 13(5):537-555. PubMed ID: 32382953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D for the assessment of cancer patients.
    Kim SH; Jo MW; Kim HJ; Ahn JH
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Dec; 10():151. PubMed ID: 23244763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 to the EQ-5D for head and neck cancer: Can disease-specific utilities be obtained?
    Beck ACC; Kieffer JM; Retèl VP; van Overveld LFJ; Takes RP; van den Brekel MWM; van Harten WH; Stuiver MM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226077. PubMed ID: 31834892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping chronic liver disease questionnaire scores onto SF-6D utility values in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
    Kalaitzakis E; Benito de Valle M; Rahman M; Lindkvist B; Björnsson E; Chapman R; Kontodimopoulos N
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):947-57. PubMed ID: 26471264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping the cancer-specific QLQ-C30 onto the generic EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in colorectal cancer patients.
    Ameri H; Yousefi M; Yaseri M; Nahvijou A; Arab M; Akbari Sari A
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Feb; 19(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 30173585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms.
    Doble B; Lorgelly P
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):891-911. PubMed ID: 26391884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 to the generic EQ-5D in metastatic breast cancer patients.
    Kim EJ; Ko SK; Kang HY
    Qual Life Res; 2012 Sep; 21(7):1193-203. PubMed ID: 22012023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the performance of algorithms mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D index in a metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness model.
    Franken MD; de Hond A; Degeling K; Punt CJA; Koopman M; Uyl-de Groot CA; Versteegh MM; van Oijen MGH
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 18(1):240. PubMed ID: 32690011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-5L index in patients with lymphomas.
    Xu RH; Wong ELY; Jin J; Dou Y; Dong D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Dec; 21(9):1363-1373. PubMed ID: 32960388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of the external validity of mapping QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D preferences.
    Crott R; Versteegh M; Uyl-de-Groot C
    Qual Life Res; 2013 Jun; 22(5):1045-54. PubMed ID: 22743734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer to the SF-6D.
    Erim DO; Bennett AV; Gaynes BN; Basak RS; Usinger D; Chen RC
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2919-2928. PubMed ID: 33993437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-general or -Colorectal to SF-6D in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Rowen D; McGhee SM; Ma KP; Law WL; Poon JT; Chan P; Kwong DL; Tsang J
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 22583460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of the SF-6D utility score from Lung cancer FACT-L: a mapping study in China.
    Yang Q; Jiang LL; Li YF; Huang D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Nov; 21(1):122. PubMed ID: 37964348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from EORTC QLQ data in myeloma for use in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Kharroubi SA; Edlin R; Meads D; Browne C; Brown J; McCabe C
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 25784746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 onto EQ-5D-5L in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
    Ameri H; Yousefi M; Yaseri M; Nahvijou A; Arab M; Akbari Sari A
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2020 Mar; 51(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 30977049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.