181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25391633)
1. Use of remote response devices: an effective interactive method in the long- term learning.
Millor M; Etxano J; Slon P; García-Barquín P; Villanueva A; Bastarrika G; Pueyo JC
Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):894-900. PubMed ID: 25391633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the clinical decision support tool ESR eGUIDE for teaching medical students the appropriate selection of imaging tests: randomized cross-over evaluation.
Diekhoff T; Kainberger F; Oleaga L; Dewey M; Zimmermann E
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5684-5689. PubMed ID: 32435929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual lectures for undergraduate radiology teaching.
Sendra-Portero F; Torales-Chaparro OE; Ruiz-Gómez MJ; Martínez-Morillo M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):888-93. PubMed ID: 23434454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.
Costa ML; van Rensburg L; Rushton N
Med Educ; 2007 Feb; 41(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 17269956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.
Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the learning potential of an interactive digital game versus an interactive-style didactic lecture: the continued importance of didactic teaching in medical student education.
Courtier J; Webb EM; Phelps AS; Naeger DM
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Dec; 46(13):1787-1796. PubMed ID: 27580908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid Interactive and Didactic Teaching Format Improves Resident Retention and Attention Compared to Traditional Lectures.
Pamarthi V; Grimm L; Johnson K; Maxfield C
Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):1269-1273. PubMed ID: 31085099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and utilization of a web-based application as a robust radiology teaching tool (radstax) for medical student anatomy teaching.
Colucci PG; Kostandy P; Shrauner WR; Arleo E; Fuortes M; Griffin AS; Huang YH; Juluru K; Tsiouris AJ
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 25964956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of interactive three-dimensional image post-processing software into undergraduate radiology education effectively improves diagnostic skills and visual-spatial ability.
Rengier F; Häfner MF; Unterhinninghofen R; Nawrotzki R; Kirsch J; Kauczor HU; Giesel FL
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1366-71. PubMed ID: 23415424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students.
Leong S; Mc Laughlin P; O'Connor OJ; O'Flynn S; Maher MM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Mar; 9(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 22386168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Into the Radiology Clerkship: Comparison of Didactic Format and Group-Based Learning.
Stein MW; Frank SJ; Roberts JH; Finkelstein M; Heo M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 26908202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology.
Maleck M; Fischer MR; Kammer B; Zeiler C; Mangel E; Schenk F; Pfeifer KJ
Radiographics; 2001; 21(4):1025-32. PubMed ID: 11452078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of medical students in end of course radiology assessment--significance for medicine.
Olanrewaju DA
West Afr J Med; 1994; 13(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8080825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of eLearning for the teaching of undergraduate ophthalmology at medical school: a randomised controlled crossover study.
Petrarca CA; Warner J; Simpson A; Petrarca R; Douiri A; Byrne D; Jackson TL
Eye (Lond); 2018 Sep; 32(9):1498-1503. PubMed ID: 29802293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Constructing an experiential education model in undergraduate radiology education by the utilization of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS).
Chen Y; Zheng K; Ye S; Wang J; Xu L; Li Z; Meng Q; Yang J; Feng ST
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Oct; 19(1):383. PubMed ID: 31638969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of a mobile application for the development of palpation and ultrasound imaging skills to supplement the traditional learning of physiotherapy students.
Fernández-Lao C; Cantarero-Villanueva I; Galiano-Castillo N; Caro-Morán E; Díaz-Rodríguez L; Arroyo-Morales M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):274. PubMed ID: 27756288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training improves medical student performance in image interpretation.
Dawes TJ; Vowler SL; Allen CM; Dixon AK
Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):775-6. PubMed ID: 15447965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy.
Shiozawa T; Butz B; Herlan S; Kramer A; Hirt B
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27273871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
