85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25391790)
1. Bone quality assessment for total hip arthroplasty with intraoperative trabecular torque measurements.
Klotz MC; Beckmann NA; Bitsch RG; Seebach E; Reiner T; Jäger S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2014 Nov; 9():109. PubMed ID: 25391790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can intraoperative measurement of bone quality help in decision making for cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?
Eckert JA; Jaeger S; Klotz MC; Schwarze M; Bitsch RG
Knee; 2018 Aug; 25(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 29792279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical torque measurement predicts load to implant cut-out: a biomechanical study investigating DHS anchorage in femoral heads.
Suhm N; Hengg C; Schwyn R; Windolf M; Quarz V; Hänni M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 17165032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical torque measurement for in vivo quantification of bone strength in the proximal femur.
Mueller MA; Hengg C; Hirschmann M; Schmid D; Sprecher C; Audigé L; Suhm N
Injury; 2012 Oct; 43(10):1712-7. PubMed ID: 22795727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of bone strength by intraoperative torque measurement: a technical note.
Suhm N; Haenni M; Schwyn R; Hirschmann M; Müller AM
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jun; 128(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 18297298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA.
Aldinger PR; Sabo D; Pritsch M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Aug; 73(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 14565592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical torque measurement in the proximal femur correlates to failure load and bone mineral density ex vivo.
Grote S; Noeldeke T; Blauth M; Mutschler W; Bürklein D
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2013 Jun; 5(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 23888206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different DXA acquisition modes on monitoring the changes in bone mineral density after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Hakulinen MA; Borg H; Häkkinen A; Parviainen T; Kiviranta I; Jurvelin JS
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22071027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.
Hsu JT; Wang SP; Huang HL; Chen YJ; Wu J; Tsai MT
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2611-8. PubMed ID: 24011361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of osteoarthritis on the regional anatomical variation of subchondral trabecular bone in the femoral head.
Tsouknidas A; Anagnostidis K; Panagiotidou S; Michailidis N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Jun; 30(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 25823901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength.
Holzer G; von Skrbensky G; Holzer LA; Pichl W
J Bone Miner Res; 2009 Mar; 24(3):468-74. PubMed ID: 19016592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Densitometric, morphometric and mechanical distributions in the human proximal femur.
Nazarian A; Muller J; Zurakowski D; Müller R; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2573-9. PubMed ID: 17258221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior-anterior and lateral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of vertebral osteoporosis and bone loss among older men.
Zmuda JM; Cauley JA; Glynn NW; Finkelstein JS
J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Jul; 15(7):1417-24. PubMed ID: 10893693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DensiProbe Spine: a novel instrument for intraoperative measurement of bone density in transpedicular screw fixation.
Deckelmann S; Schwyn R; Van der Pol B; Windolf M; Heini PF; Benneker LM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 20195209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type.
Hayaishi Y; Miki H; Nishii T; Hananouchi T; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1208-13. PubMed ID: 18078893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement and accuracy of bone mineral after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.
Bloebaum RD; Liau DW; Lester DK; Rosenbaum TG
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):612-22. PubMed ID: 16781417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
