These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
31. Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness. Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Mar; 27(2):18. PubMed ID: 33733708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What to do when your grant is rejected. Crow JM Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7795):477-479. PubMed ID: 32071452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant. Gordon R; Poulin BJ Account Res; 2009; 16(1):13-40. PubMed ID: 19247851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The future of European research. Abbott A Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7282):722-3. PubMed ID: 20148007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The future of science will soon be upon us. Macilwain C Nature; 2015 Aug; 524(7564):137. PubMed ID: 26268160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Korngreen A Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Indeed: Cost of the NSERC science grant peer review system exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant. Gordon R; Poulin BJ Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 20183164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact: Pack a punch. Dance A Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):397-8. PubMed ID: 24137828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The productivity and impact of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar Program: the apparent positive effect of peer review. Lichtman MA; Oakes D Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2001; 27(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 11831869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Research grants: the nightmare before funding. Giles J Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7057):308-11. PubMed ID: 16163319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]