These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25391954)

  • 21. Research grants: Conform and be funded.
    Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EURYI: present procedure risks conflicts of interest.
    Lente G
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):192. PubMed ID: 16148909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. German paper chase to end.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7284):1009. PubMed ID: 20182483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cutting random funding decisions.
    Graves N; Barnett AG; Clarke P
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7330):299. PubMed ID: 21248827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Religion: Faith in science.
    Waldrop MM
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7334):323-5. PubMed ID: 21331019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. European grants: a lifeline in poorly funded countries.
    Fainzilber M
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7211):285. PubMed ID: 18800109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Division of labour.
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):727-8. PubMed ID: 17700657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness.
    Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Mar; 27(2):18. PubMed ID: 33733708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What to do when your grant is rejected.
    Crow JM
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7795):477-479. PubMed ID: 32071452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
    Gordon R; Poulin BJ
    Account Res; 2009; 16(1):13-40. PubMed ID: 19247851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The future of European research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7282):722-3. PubMed ID: 20148007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The future of science will soon be upon us.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2015 Aug; 524(7564):137. PubMed ID: 26268160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Indeed: Cost of the NSERC science grant peer review system exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
    Gordon R; Poulin BJ
    Account Res; 2009 Jul; 16(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 20183164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact: Pack a punch.
    Dance A
    Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):397-8. PubMed ID: 24137828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The productivity and impact of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar Program: the apparent positive effect of peer review.
    Lichtman MA; Oakes D
    Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2001; 27(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 11831869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research grants: the nightmare before funding.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7057):308-11. PubMed ID: 16163319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.