These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25392620)

  • 1. Minimally invasive hysterectomy at a university teaching hospital.
    Mitri M; Fanning J; Davies M; Kesterson J; Ural S; Kunselman A; Harkins G
    JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Uteri Greater Than One Kilogram.
    Ito TE; Vargas MV; Moawad GN; Opoku-Anane J; Shu MK; Marfori CQ; Robinson JK
    JSLS; 2017; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 28352147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association Between Body Mass Index, Uterine Size, and Operative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
    Shah DK; Van Voorhis BJ; Vitonis AF; Missmer SA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 27523922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
    Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
    Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.
    Wesol A; Woolley S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.
    Moen M; Noone M; Cholkeri-Singh A; Vassallo B; Locker B; Miller C
    J Robot Surg; 2014 Mar; 8(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 27637233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complication rate of uterine morcellation in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Smits RM; De Kruif JH; Van Heteren CF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():179-82. PubMed ID: 26943477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.
    Ottosen C; Lingman G; Ottosen L
    BJOG; 2000 Nov; 107(11):1380-5. PubMed ID: 11117766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
    Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    El-Mowafi D; Madkour W; Lall C; Wenger JM
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15200770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.