240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25392662)
1. Updated hysterectomy surveillance and factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Cohen SL; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.
Price JT; Zimmerman LD; Koelper NC; Sammel MD; Lee S; Butts SF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):572.e1-572.e10. PubMed ID: 28784416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing Utilization of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Walters MD; Ridgeway BM
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 60(2):273-285. PubMed ID: 28263200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.
Multinu F; Casarin J; Hanson KT; Angioni S; Mariani A; Habermann EB; Laughlin-Tommaso SK
JAMA Surg; 2018 Jun; 153(6):e180141. PubMed ID: 29641835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.
Lee J; Jennings K; Borahay MA; Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Snyder RR; Patel PR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):656-61. PubMed ID: 24462854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.
Settnes A; Topsoee MF; Moeller C; Dueholm M; Kopp TI; Norrbom C; Rasmussen SC; Froeslev PA; Joergensen A; Dreisler E; Gimbel H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1344-1353.e3. PubMed ID: 31740432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
Kovac SR
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):787-93. PubMed ID: 10831967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Associations between Race/Ethnicity, Uterine Fibroids, and Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the VA Healthcare System.
Callegari LS; Katon JG; Gray KE; Doll K; Pauk S; Lynch KE; Uchendu US; Zephyrin L; Gardella C
Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 30293778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.
Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):665.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26188114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
