187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25393654)
21. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CAPNet: Context attention pyramid network for computer-aided detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wang J; Sun H; Jiang K; Cao W; Chen S; Zhu J; Yang X; Zheng J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107831. PubMed ID: 37783114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications.
Gurcan MN; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Apr; 9(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 11942656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Adversarial Training for Denoising Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Jul; 40(7):1805-1816. PubMed ID: 33729933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Vargas-Voracek R; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.
Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Wu T; Rafferty EA; Moore R; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91. PubMed ID: 16532956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimization of the key imaging parameters for detection of microcalcifications in a newly developed digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Park HS; Kim YS; Kim HJ; Choi JG; Choi YW
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23891226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Sainz de Cea MV; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045014. PubMed ID: 29364138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
Netsch T; Peitgen HO
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 19474373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis using ensemble convolutional neural network.
Xiao B; Sun H; Meng Y; Peng Y; Yang X; Chen S; Yan Z; Zheng J
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):71. PubMed ID: 34320986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
