BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25393654)

  • 21. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CAPNet: Context attention pyramid network for computer-aided detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Wang J; Sun H; Jiang K; Cao W; Chen S; Zhu J; Yang X; Zheng J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107831. PubMed ID: 37783114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications.
    Gurcan MN; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N; Helvie MA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Apr; 9(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 11942656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Adversarial Training for Denoising Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Jul; 40(7):1805-1816. PubMed ID: 33729933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Vargas-Voracek R; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.
    Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Wu T; Rafferty EA; Moore R; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91. PubMed ID: 16532956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19478639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of the key imaging parameters for detection of microcalcifications in a newly developed digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Park HS; Kim YS; Kim HJ; Choi JG; Choi YW
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23891226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Sainz de Cea MV; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045014. PubMed ID: 29364138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
    Netsch T; Peitgen HO
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 19474373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis using ensemble convolutional neural network.
    Xiao B; Sun H; Meng Y; Peng Y; Yang X; Chen S; Yan Z; Zheng J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):71. PubMed ID: 34320986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms.
    van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.