143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25393983)
1. Micro- and macrosurgical techniques in the coverage of gingival recession using connective tissue graft: 2 years follow-up.
Nizam N; Bengisu O; Sönmez Ş
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 25393983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative.
Andrade PF; Grisi MF; Marcaccini AM; Fernandes PG; Reino DM; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Novaes AB
J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20583919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques.
Burkhardt R; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 15766372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gingival recession treatment with concentrated growth factor membrane: a comparative clinical trial.
Akcan SK; Ünsal B
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190236. PubMed ID: 32236353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the effectiveness and predictability of transpositional flap vs connective tissue graft for coverage of Miller's class-I and class-II facial marginal tissue recession lesions: a clinical study.
Baghele ON; Pol DG
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 22945709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical application of autologous fibroblast cell culture in gingival recession treatment.
Milinkovic I; Aleksic Z; Jankovic S; Popovic O; Bajic M; Cakic S; Lekovic V
J Periodontal Res; 2015 Jun; 50(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 25040690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
